OffshoreAlert
Daily news, documents and intelligence about Offshore Financial Centers and those who conduct business in them that you will not find anywhere else.
RSS Feed Print
First International Bank Of Grenada Assets Attornies Players & Updates
Anonymous
Posted: Saturday, August 13, 2011

Posted: 11/29/2006 7:50:31 AM

By: hera feinstein

why are all these information posted again and again... they are well known to anybody interested

as soon as you detect names like JEROME SCHNEIDER, ZIEGLER/ZEIGLER/VAN BRINK etc. in any information - forget everything you heard about "serious" business... they are crooks and criminals... nothing less

... all these facts can be checked by simply do a google-search - so... why are they posted here again and again?


Internal Administrator
Posted: Saturday, August 13, 2011
Joined: 10/12/2010
Posts: 5780


Posted: 11/27/2006 7:21:50 PM

By: Offshore Informant

====

SUBJECT: Assets, Banks, Businesses, Individuals, and Frauds
DATE: 27NOV06
FROM: Offshore Informant
REPLY-TO: OffshoreInformant@safe-mail.net
TO: All Concerned

- - - -

INTRODUCTION

On June 3, 1996 FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL BANK INC. ( FIB ) was registered as an independent offshore bank under license number 500 in the Republic of Nauru. FIB INC. bank moved its registered office from Dominica to Belize, and then to Barbados.

Interestingly, the FIB INC. bank license was originally registered to an Edward Ziegler, but was later sold through Richard Bullock of Langley, British Columbia, Canada for Jerome Schneider of the USA to Cynthia Joy ("Tai") Hastey of the USA with the required capitalization of $100,000 and Gilbert Allen Ziegler was named as its executive director.

FIB obtained $200-million in 'assets under management', which consisted of gold reserves located in the U.S. state of Montana through William E. Siegfried, Esq. of Palm Springs, California on behalf of his client Walter R. Wellman of Utah.

By August 1, 1997 FIB had obtained $2.5-billion (USD) worth of 'assets under management', which consisted of gold reserves in Baja, California, Mexico through Armstrong Mertyl of New Jersey, USA on behalf of Dr. William M. McKnight of Texas, USA.

On or about October 7, 1997 the Grenada Ministry of Finance accepted through its executive director Michael Creft in excess of $2.25-million (USD) from James Gregory “Zig” Ziegler, which consisted of a certificate of deposit drawn on a local Grenada commercial bank in the amount of $500,000 'cash', plus an envelope of paperwork relating to miscellaneous gemstone assets, which ‘did not include a ‘$15-million (USD) ruby statue’ as many were led to believe, in-exchange for the Grenada government issuance of a Grenada Class I Offshore Banking License Number 5 - signed by Grenada Prime Minister Dr. Keith Mitchell - for FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LTD. ( FIBG ) that was personally handed to James Gregory “Zig” Ziegler who turned it over to his brother Gilbert Allen Ziegler, who was elected as the first CEO of FIBG bank, and later in 1998, became known as Van Arthur Brink.

On or about October 12, 1997 FIB bank (Nauru) was provided with a Deed of Assignment' signed by Daniel C. Rodius as President of RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT INC. (below) on behalf of an immigrant from Hungary named Dr. Zoltan Jászberényi [ 921 Scandia Court, Escondido, California 92025, USA, MOBILE: (760) 888-9550, TEL: (760) 740-2503, E-MAIL: zjti2004@yahoo.com ], which consisted of one (1) hand carved ruby statue known as "A Boy And The Water Buffalo" - depicting an oriental boy holding a water buffalo horn he rode, appraised with a 10,000 ct. wt. value of $15-million (USD).

Although James Gregory “Zig” Ziegler, the brother of Van A. Brink first hired Anselm Clouden in Grenada to establish FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LTD. ( FIBG ) on October 7, 1997 by December 31, 1997 FIBG bank claimed to have more than “$100-billion (USD) dollars worth of assets under management,” plus "assets held in trust, managed on behalf of clients, valued at $74-billion (USD) dollars.”

Assets distributed to FIB and FIBG banks came through Armstrong Mertyl of Trinidad and the USA on behalf of Dr. William M. McKnight of Texas, William E. Seigfried of California on behalf of Walter R. Wellman of Utah, Daniel Chad Rodius of Nevada on behalf of Dr. Zoltan Jászberényi of Hungary and the USA, and Robert Earl Palm of Canada on behalf of Dr. Günter Berthold Horn of Germany through Wong Yat Hin of Malaysia from a legacy Trust belonging to a China Triad Family involved for decades in Far East opium and heroin trade in-exchange for precious metals, fine art, and other valuables that operated out of a geographic region once known as the Republic of China, known today as Taiwan.

- - - -

HISTORICAL NOTE

Mr. T.C. Huang Family dynasty in China produced all China currency for the BANK OF CHINA. Interestingly, Mr. T.C. Huang was arrested on federal charges in Los Angeles, California during the 1980s after leaving as CEO of IMPERIAL BANK in Encino, California. Mrs. March Fong Eu, the California Secretary of State, came to rely heavily on Mr. T.C. Huang and his wife while they lived next to each other in Los Angeles, California when it was a matter of life and death as a Los Angeles Police Department intelligence reports indicate.

- - - -

RESEARCH

[NOTE: SEC case background information (below)]

- - - -

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO 15880 / September 14, 1998

SEC

V.

TEDDY WAYNE SOLOMON and LISA STEVENS individually and dba PLATINUM INTERNATIONAL, and QUANTUM GROUP (aka) QUANTUM TRADING LTD.

3:97-CV-2712-H (USDC/ND TX, Dallas Division)

On September 9, 1998 a civil action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") involving so-called "prime bank" securities, defendants Teddy Wayne Solomon ("Solomon"), Lisa Stevens ("Stevens") and QUANTUM GROUP ("Quantum") agreed to the entry of orders of permanent injunction against them.

The Commission also filed an amended complaint to seek recovery from four persons who refuse to return $400,000 of funds Solomon obtained from investors.

The orders, which enjoin Solomon, Stevens and QUANTUM from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, arise from charges in the Commission's original complaint that they fraudulently offered and sold interests in fictitious "prime bank instrument" trading programs through PLATINUM INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATES and QUANTUM.

The complaint alleged that Solomon and Stevens represented, among other things, that they were agents for foreign securities traders trading in large-denomination debt instruments issued by "one of the top 25 world banks," and that an investment in the trading programs would generate "safe, guaranteed" returns of as much as 4,300% annually. In fact, according to the complaint, Solomon's and Stevens' representations were false: the trading programs did not exist, and Solomon and Stevens, in an apparent "Ponzi scheme," used funds taken from investors to pay supposed profits to their business associates, to repay other investors, and for their own purposes.

The court also ordered Solomon and QUANTUM, and relief defendants QUANTUM AIR EXPRESS INC. and CHEROKEE WORLDWIDE EXPRESS INC. to pay disgorgement, jointly and severally, in the amount of $2,929,510 plus prejudgment interest, with two provisos:

(1) That Solomon be credited for any sums actually collected by the Commission in this or any ancillary proceeding against any person holding funds that were paid or given to them by Solomon from the proceeds of the unlawful activities alleged in the complaint; and

(2) That any remaining amount be waived based on Solomon's demonstrated financial inability to pay.

Stevens was also ordered to pay disgorgement in the amount of $19,210 plus prejudgment interest, however payment of the full amount was waived based on her demonstrated financial inability to pay. Because of their poor financial condition, no civil money penalties were imposed on Solomon or Stevens.

In pursuit of recovering additional investor funds, the Commission amended its original complaint to add four (4) relief defendants to the action:

- FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL BANK ( "FIB INC. bank");
- Gilbert Zeigler (aka) Van A. Brink;
- DUNAMIS ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL ( "DUNAMIS" ); and,
- Graham Young.

The amended complaint charges that FIB, DUNAMIS, Zeigler, and Young hold and refuse to return $400,000 of funds Solomon obtained from investors, which they know to have been obtained illegally by Solomon and subject to an asset freeze order entered by the court.

- - - -

From 1997 through 2000, FIBG bank held over $230-billion (USD) dollars worth of assets tied into Joint Venture contract agreements with others ‘for others’ held under the names of numerous international business companies (IBCs) where ‘at least’ two (2) known instances of those assets were being successfully traded through the U.S. financial system as both documents and witnesses now prove, however those trading profits never fully reached their distributed points in accordance with those Joint Venture agreements. The reasons why monies never reached their initial intended joint venture partners has been thoroughly investigated, however never publicly released to this day.

On or about February 12, 1998 FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA, LTD. caused to be placed $100-K (US) into a Certificate of Deposit (CD) at a Grenada bank known as the National Commercial Bank.

On or about April 1998 FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA, LTD. received its first (1st) deposit.

On or about October 13, 1998 FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA, LTD. reverted the aforementioned assigned asset, back to RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT, INC.

Van Brink was told by Daniel Chad Rodius that RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT INC. was an exhausted Arizona copper mine and smelter that left behind a huge mountain of slag assayed at about 40% iron, which he was trying to come up with financing for to start mining and refining the slag mountain of iron for sale to Japan.

Each year Brink was financially bailing Rodius out from losing everything by having helped to keep some annual payment of Rodius' current.

Because of that, Rodius made the assignments of the 'ruby', and the Bermuda stock exchange shares of now defunct 'mutual fund company' called ARISTOCRAT ENDEAVOR FUND LTD. to FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL BANK (NAURU). Assignments, which Brink later deeded back to Rodius - in one (1) year - with a verbal agreement. Brink used those (as above) to show 'initial capitalization of FIBG' until he could land the larger bank instruments on the books of FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LTD., which were already in the works.

Under pressure from the F.B.I., Rodius claimed the ARISTOCRAT ENDEAVOR FUND LTD. shares were 'collateral for a loan' to come from FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL BANK (NAURU), which was false because, they had been placed on the bank's books via 'deed of assignment', not via 'loan' and 'collateral agreement'.

Reportedly, the F.B.I. contacted the "real" owner of the ruby who claimed to have never heard of FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LTD. or Van A. Brink and never assigned the 'ruby' to anyone. If that was true, then RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT INC. 'committed fraud' by making that assignment to FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL BANK (NAURU) in the first place.

It is believed Rodius had a silent (capital) partner (in either RODIUS-THOMAS DEVELOPMENT or RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT INC.) who placed the 'ruby' with RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT INC. that assigned it to FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL BANK (NAURU), and when FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LTD. absorbed the assets of FIB INC. bank the ruby was assigned back to RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT INC., which Brink believed Rodius may have done without consulting his silent (capital) partner.

- - - -

RESEARCH NOTES

NAME: Dan Chad Rodius (aka) Danny Chad Rodius
DOB: 09JUL44
POB: Tacoma, Washington, USA
DOD: 01JAN03
AGE: 59
CAUSE OF DEATH: Homicide (gun shot wound)
DETAILS: Domestic disturbance with his son, David John Rodius.
PLACE OF BURIAL: WARM SPRINGS CEMETARY, Henderson, Nevada.

Previous Addresses:

2003:

2065 Majestic Peak Drive
Henderson, Nevada
USA

1990:

5915 McLeod Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89120
USA

Family Members:

WIFE: Grace Rodius (marriage of: 25-yrs.)
SON(S): David John Rodius, and Mark Rodius
DAUGHTER(S): Stacy Rodius (Henderson, NV), and Traci -lnu- (Dallas, TX)
BROTHER: John Rodius (Shelton, WA)
SISTER(S): Jeannie -lnu- (Tacoma, WA), and Mary Anne -lnu- (Tacoma, WA)
HALF-SISTER: Lilly Christiansen (Tacoma, WA)

Personal Information:

RELIGION: Mormon (LDS)
OTHER: 30-year resident of the State of Nevada.

Credit Information:

DESERET FEDERAL CREDIT UNION (1990)
P.O. Box 15148
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
USA

[NOTE: A Mormon church-owned credit union.]

Businesses:

2003:

RODIUS-THOMAS DEVELOPMENT

[NO 'NEVADA' RECORDS]

1999:

DANNS CORP. INC.
c/o RITE INC. (Registered Agent)
1905 South Eastern Ave.
Las Vegas, Nevada 89104
USA

Contact: Dan C. Rodius, President/Secretary/Treasurer

File number: C21696-1999
State filed: NEVADA
Date of incorporation: 01SEP99

Resident Agent (Approved):

RITE INC.
1905 South Eastern Ave.
Las Vegas, Nevada 89104
USA

1998:

CLARKDALE IRON L.L.C.
2929 South Maryland Parkway
Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
USA

Contact: Dan C. Rodius, Manager/Member

File number: LLC1261-1998
State filed: NEVADA
Date of incorporation: 05MAR98

Resident Agent (Approved):

RITE INC.
1905 South Eastern Ave.
Las Vegas, Nevada 89104
USA

1996:

NEVADA IRON COMPANY LLC
2929 South Maryland Parkway
Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
USA
CONTACT: Dan C. Rodius, Manager / Member

File Number: LLC9041-1996
State filed: NEVADA
Date of incorporation: 22APR96

Resident Agent (Approved):

RITE INC.
1905 South Eastern Ave.
Las Vegas, Nevada 89104
USA

1994:

RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT, INC.
2929 South Maryland Parkway
Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
USA

Contact: Dan C. Rodius, President/Secretary

File number: C4196-1994
State filed: NEVADA
Date of incorporation: 17MAR94

Resident Agent (Approved):

RITE INC.
1905 South Eastern Ave.
Las Vegas, Nevada 89104
USA

- - - -

Van A. Brink obtained the complete legal insurance description and documentation on that particular ‘ruby statue’ from Daniel Chad Rodius of RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT INC.

According to Brink, "The evidence of capitalization presented for FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LTD. was $500,000 in a cash deposit, the 10,000 carat carved ruby statue valued at $15-million (if memory serves me), plus 905,000 shares of Aristocrat Endeavor Fund Ltd stock valued at $17-million for trading on the Bahamas Stock Exchange. The capital structure for FIBG LTD. bank that the Grenada Minister of Finance approved, was replaced as quickly as possible with cash and cash-equivalent instruments issued by Top 100 banks."

FBI Special Agent Jim Daniels was believed to have supposedly interviewed the 'owner of the ruby' Dr. Zoltan Jászberényi who 'claimed' the ruby never left his possession and was in his safe. No mention was made to where the safe was located or whether FBI S.A. James Daniels ever actually 'saw' the ruby produced by its ‘owner(s)’.

Brink further stated, "First Bank [ FIBG LTD. bank ] received Deed of Assignment to all of RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT INC. right, title, and interest in the stone. I believe the equitable interest deeded was because of RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT INC. having received deeded equitable interest. It is also conspicuous that this alleged 'real' owner has not filed a criminal complaint against RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT, nor has the U.S. Attorney’s Office filed any criminal charges against RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT, its officers, and directors for what would amount to outright fraud, if the inferences the government wants those to draw from their report of discussions with the 'real owner' of the ruby are/is indeed as they represent them to be. I think there’s a good reason for them not doing that."

On October 1, 1999 Van A. Brink resigned as CEO of FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LTD. agreeing to remain a “consultant” for FIBG LTD. bank.

On or about August 4, 2002 Brink stated, "The 'proof' the ruby existed was three (3) items presented to the Grenada Registrar of Offshore Financial Services, i.e. the executive director of Grenada International Financial Services Authority ( GIFSA ), namely:

(1) A copy of a comprehensive appraisal report by a certified gemologist stating the value of the stone to be $20-million and providing photographs of the stone as well as details of its size, markings, grade, etc.;

(2) A copy of an insurance policy that existed on the stone from a recognized, reputable insurance company that insured the stone's owner for $20-million in the event of theft, provided that the stone was kept secure; and,

(3) A file copy of the original, notarized transfer of ownership document from the stone's previous insured owner to FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LIMITED the bank maintained the original transfer document in its files."

According to Brink, FBI S.A. James Daniels claimed to have amassed 43 or 47 compact discs (C-Ds) filled with compressed tag image file (“.tif”) documents that had to have been scanned early-on from FIBG LTD. bank depositor records, asset owner records, as well as presumably bank records, etc. These .tif image document files were seen as an inefficient way of electronically storing data that forced Brink to inquire how many images per disk. Daniels was said to have indicated, "In the area of 3,300 electronic images per disk,” which actually translated to about 142,000 ‘pages of paper documents’ that had already been scanned to disk.

HIGH-VALUE ASSETS

On the issue of large asset instruments, Van Brink had this to say . . .

"It is common for an original asset owner to have highly valuable instruments or other assets in safe-keeping or possession, the access to which is regulated by the deeds of assignment and supporting agreements. That’s the way it was with the $3.8-billion DAI-ICHI KANGYO cheques, $47.5-billion BANK OF JAPAN gold bullion assets, and $8.7-billion UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND gold and platinum instruments. Physical custody does have meaning, but within a context. Binding agreements are the contexts that mean everything. First Bank [ FIBG LTD. bank ] was the end party in a chain of binding agreements."

John Taylor [ Falkirk, Scotland ], a consultant for the BANK OF SCOTLAND, had the $3.8-billion (USD) two (2) DAI-ICHI KANGYO BANK CO. LTD. cheques verified on a bank-to-bank basis through an acquaintance of the daughter of the former Prime Minister of Japan Ryutaro Hashimoto. [ http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~ba031/dec97.html ]

London, UK barrister Lawrence A. Jones - on instructions from Van Brink - met with John Taylor, and then the Grenada Minister of Finance. Lawrence Jones and John Taylor flew to Tokyo, Japan to verify the $3.8-billion DAI-ICHI cheques, which were FIBG LTD. bank assets. Shortly thereafter, a Grenada government spokeswoman announced at a Press conference that FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA 2000 LTD. [ FIBG 2000 LTD. bank ] had been granted a license to operate as a Grenada offshore bank by the Grenada Minister of Finance, with Lawrence Jones named as CEO.

At no time did John Taylor or Lawrence Jones ever report the $3.8-billion DAI-ICHI cheque assets as bogus. They had every opportunity and obligation to do so, if those were. An FIBG LTD. bank Board member used their credit card to finance that asset verification trip to Japan.

On or about October 4, 2001 Van Brink had this to say about the missing bank records, "PWC agent liquidator Marcus A. Wide statement about ‘affidavits certifying that true copies were made of the document copies’, would have to do with when ( June / early July 2000 ) I strongly advised the Board to go back to the ‘original deeding parties’ and obtain ‘certified true copy packages’ of the assignments since First Bank’s original documents had mysteriously disappeared after Kennedy entered into agreement with MacEnroe ( February / March 2000 ) prior to Kennedy’s resignation ( June 4, 2000 ). In certifying true, the documents the attorneys for SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (and another company) had would have ‘certified photocopies’ of the ‘photocopies those assigning companies retained in their possession’ as ‘original assignment documents’ and ‘affidavits’ that were in First Bank’s possession but were - at that time - missing."

With regard to Gabriel MacEnroe having represented a European consortium prepared to takeover FIBG LTD. bank, Brink asserted his successor FIBG LTD. bank CEO, Mark Kennedy, entered an agreement through Gabriel MacEnroe that saw FIBG high-value asset holdings removed, which later provided an appearance of never having existed.

Further, FIBG LTD. bank CEO Kennedy was asked to sign the MacEnroe package as a 'bail out' (of a bankrupt bank), informed by MacEnroe that “Brink was ‘going down' with or without his ( Kennedy's ) help, Kennedy signed an agreement to 'cooperate with Grenada and international investigations designed to ‘bring Brink down', that the “new assets” - nick-named by MacEnroe - offered to come with an income stream sufficient to meet the interest payment obligations of the bank were some of the ‘previously-held FIBG LTD. bank assets’ where ‘at least one’ were UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND bank guarantees and certificates of deposits tied to precious metals within former Indonesian Premier Ir. Soekarno and Mr. A.G. Pringgodigdo heritance estates, that FIBG LTD. bank would be made a "project management bank for the IMF," and Kennedy made bank President upon the revision of FIBG LTD. bank restructuring.

On or about March 9, 2002 Van Brink had this to say, "Mark Kennedy once e-mailed me to inform me that one of the conditions of his 'bail out' agreement with MacEnroe was that he cooperate fully with 'international and Grenada law enforcement authorities' in their investigation of me. I don’t know what all that might mean, but a CEO does have access to all bank records of any kind. I know, for instance, that all paper files that were maintained at my residence and both hard drives from my two computers were taken into custody on Mark’s instructions. While those wouldn’t contain depositor records, they would be every other type of record concerning assets, negotiations, correspondence, etc."

Van Brink relied on locating 'witnesses' should 'all' the documentation disappear, even from the files of the U.S. government, but unfortunately he wasn't counting on the death of Daniel C. Rodius or his own death when he said, "The one reason that comes to my mind is that they would not wish to be made to look so foolish in open court. Even IF. . . even if they managed to shred or burn all applicable documents in the bank's files AND in the government's files. . . and even though I do not have duplicate files in my possession, I do know the original party in that transaction and could re-assemble the evidence for my defense in court, if called upon to do so."

On February 20, 2000 FIBG LTD. CEO Mark Kennedy flew to Switzerland where at the MOZART HOTEL in Rorschach he received a FAX from Gabriel Francis MacEnroe ( of Dublin, Ireland; Egham, UK; and, St. Gallen, Switzerland ) who had been meeting with his Trust attorney and friend Dr. Max Broder and his Vaduz, Liechtenstein attorney Walter Matt regarding FIBG LTD. bank high-value assets. MacEnroe claimed that something could be done with the UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND $8.7-billion gold assets and the DAI-ICHI KANGYO BANK CO. LTD. $3.8-billion cheques, which he would detail for Kennedy during their meeting in 2-days, recommending Kennedy discuss details with FIBG LTD. bank legal counsel Ms. Marion Suite, Esq.

After June 8, 2000, when London, UK barrister Lawrence A. Jones accepted his position as CEO of FIBG LTD. bank, Jones assigned his UK law office partner Michael (“Barclay”) Butler to supervise FIBG LTD. bank while Jones met several times with Gabriel MacEnroe and the Grenada Minister Of Finance to negotiate asset restructuring of FIBG LTD. bank.

Michael (“Barclay”) Butler contacted FIBG LTD. bank Chairman of the Board, Richard Warriner Downes, claiming Lawrence A. Jones offered to place Downes within eight (8) banks out-of Venezuela after FIBG LTD. bank successfully transitioned assets planned in restructuring. The banks were believed-affiliated through Venezuela’s CARONI BANK.

====

LEGEND (alphabetical) FOR E-MAILS (below):

bereal = Mark Kennedy (aka) mk (aka) mark (aka) Mark.
daisy = Wife of Richard W. Downes, former Chairman of the Board for FIBG LTD. bank.
daymaker = Douglas Christie- Ferguson (aka) Dug (aka) Doug.
eurotrustee = James Gregory Ziegler (aka) Zig Ziegler (aka) Zig (aka) Greg, brother of Van Brink.
euroz = James Gregory Ziegler (aka) Zig Ziegler (aka) Zig (aka) Greg, brother of Van Brink.
gator_ca = Chad Perry, Canadian assistant to President Allan Sanford (Wurtsboro, New York) of EQUITY RETIREMENT DISTRIBUTORS LTD. and INFINITY MINING CORP.
greg = James Gregory Ziegler (aka) Zig Ziegler (aka) Zig (aka) Greg, brother of Van Brink.
infocooperative = Sealand HAVENCO web server client, Kevin Bruce Wilkerson, mailing list.
informant = Paul (aka) Paco
injunearus = Richard W. Downes (aka) SWS Injunearus (aka) Richard.
investtlarimore = Gary Wilson Lacy, claimed highest security clearance held with U.S. National Security Agency (NSA).
paco = Paul (aka) Informant.
restoration = Sealand HAVENCO web server client, Kevin Bruce Wilkerson, mailing list.
rms = Melissa Skirving (aka) Missi Skirving
smail005 = Mark Kennedy (aka) mk
sonso = Van Arthur Brink (aka) Van (fka) Gilbert Allen Ziegler

====

CIRCA: 2003

[NOTE: Intercepted e-mails (use LEGEND above).]

-------- Original Message --------

From: sonso@sealand.pmmit.com
To: smail005@sealand.pmmit.com
CC: (no CC recipients)
Bcc: informant@sealand.pmmit.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:27:56 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Re: Bang A Gong !

You have not previously read this message

Body of message:

I forwarded your remarks to Paul (Offshore Informant). Feel free to send him an e-mail directly and offer more of your perspectives.

I have cooperated with him because he incredibly enough seemed willing to do a more in-depth story surrounding FIBG.

I've shared with him what I know and have been clear on the fact I know danged little of MacEnroe and that I haven't really dug into that with you so, the way I see it the “full story" and the "real truth" hurts neither of us. I have been and am convinced that 2 men might see things differently and disagree but that it does not make a criminal or an idiot out of either of them.

Meanwhile, I'll get back to the good stuff (as recommended). :-)

smail005@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:

---------begin original message---------

Yes very interesting stuff, some facts omitted as usual.

Gabriel MacEnroe did inform FIBG of his involvement with Bank Crozier and this information was passed to the FIBG Board of Directors. MacEnroe even had suggestions and tips to assist in combating the efforts of Bank Crozier.

MacEnroe frequently commented on Peter Johansson’s frustrating procedures, and disclosed his deposit amounts and transactions in play.

Stated he had information on fraudulent transactions by Bank Crozier and would help in their dissemination to change the focus from FIBG to Bank Crozier. Told us who Crozier was paying in the government, etc., etc., etc.

As for the others mentioned in the article Global Economic Brinkmanship, yup met them, yup they are real, yup MacEnroe is connected as it said, and the corporations were named correct too so, pretty good detective work by the Offshore Informant in that article.

But, Gabriel MacEnroe didn’t do a vanishing act with FIBG holding an empty asset bag because Lawrence Jones spoke to Gabriel MacEnroe many times with the Grenada government involved on the conditions of your former Joint Venture contract, which were not met, so there was no transaction using those, but they were doing a work around.

So many lies, so many stories. So what? Let’s get on with the new good stuff.

mk

-------- Original Message --------

====

RESEARCH

CIRCA: 2005

Mark Kennedy
MEDINA HOUSING CO-OP
7095 Stride Avenue, # 209
Burnaby
British Columbia V3N-1T3
CANADA
TEL: (604) 523-6977
TEL: (778) 288-7434 (mobile)
TEL: (604) 520-5642 (Medina Housing Co-Op)

====

CIRCA: 2003

[NOTE: Intercepted e-mails (use LEGEND above).]

-------- Original Message --------

From: smail005@sealand.pmmit.com
To: informant@seagold.net
CC: (no CC recipients)
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:54:16 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Dwelling Documents

You have not previously read this message

Body of message:

Paul,

Ok, I'll play. And, thank you for the correction. It is well received.

We both have motives for proceeding. Yours is defined below. So, in fairness, I will share mine.

I have some gaps in understanding what and who, with this entire process. I hope you will pass on any information that can fill these gaps. I find information can trigger recall to support or crush thought patterns and belief systems, so I am eager to change.

The different messages I got from Gabriel MacEnroe came from the ongoing process of change that worked on our relationship from outside. His shifting needs and demands were in response to whomever was giving him direction. This would come from meetings he had in Liechtenstein. Occasionally he would be called there and come back with a different attitude and agenda.

The critical issues for MacEnroe was that FIBG was reporting buy and sell transactions on its financial statement, and holding assets that were restricted. This issue created the conflict that ended the meeting. MacEnroe got my attention because he knew intimate details of our balance sheet plus what the issues were with each item. I had been visited twice before by, people who claimed similar agendas but none came with detailed information.

MacEnroe stated his visit to Grenada at the time was dual purpose, one, to see Crozier Bank, and two, to talk to FIBG on behalf of "Official International Interests."

The MacEnroe visit was timely because, by December of 1999 I had been at the bank long enough to figure out it could not survive without a major restructure.

I found your background information on Gabriel MacEnroe very interesting. He had told me some of what you mentioned, but your reporting is comprehensive and leaves less to wonder about.

If I were you I would focus on the Lichtenstein Trust and its Board of Directors, I am confident you will uncover his motivating factors and learn more about whom he is connected to, those people are who gave Gabriel MacEnroe his instructions.

As for the legal issues he faces I am aware of them, and do not think there will be any consequences for him or any organizations he is associated with.

What’s next?

mk

-------- Original Message --------

From: informant@seagold.net
To: smail005@sealand.pmmit.com
CC: (no CC recipients)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 02:42:26 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Re: Dwelling Documents

Hi Mark,

Thank you. Let me start by letting you know that on June 20, 2003 Gabriel MacEnroe became a federal criminal fugitive who is being hunted by INTERPOL as we speak.

Gabriel Francis MacEnroe failed to appear in federal court in Greenville, South Carolina and skipped-out on his $200,000 cash bail, which resulted in a federal fugitive warrant being issued for his arrest on 2 U.S. federal criminal cases.

During May and June 2003, however the Assistant U.S. Attorney federal prosecutor knew nothing of what was going on with the business affairs of Gabriel MacEnroe and proceeded to obtain a federal court Order from a federal judge who demanded MacEnroe turn over all his business books requiring him to obtain additional legal assistance from his attornies Dr. Max Broder in St. Gallen Switzerland for his COMMERICAL CAPITAL FINANCE LTD., Dr. Walter Matt in Vaduz, Liechtenstein for his COMMERICAL CAPITAL ESTABLISHMENT ( Anstalt ), and other financial business affair attornies in Zurich, Switzerland as well.

In January 2003, the U.S. government didn't know Gabriel MacEnroe and his attorney and Trustee Dr. Max Broder transferred businesses with a group of other business partners where one was named Walter Speirer ( Germany ) who held work access to a large German company equipped with a chemical scientific laboratory reformulating precious metal (gold, etc.) molecular structures for material science coatings MacEnroe needed to take advantage of for his own personal business formulas surrounding precious metal growth enhancements.

In May 2003, MacEnroe received a call from his South Carolina, USA criminal defense attorney advising him, that in-addition to MacEnroe’s South Carolina, USA federal criminal case, MacEnroe had yet another federal criminal case pending out-of Florida, USA before MacEnroe was scheduled to appear in his federal criminal court case on June 20, 2003 in Greenville, South Carolina, USA.

MacEnroe, while in the midst of yet other international financial business affairs, told his South Carolina, USA criminal defense attorney to get his Florida, USA federal criminal case postponed until ‘after’ his South Carolina, USA could be adjudicated.

MacEnroe had been advised by his other attornies that if he returned to South Carolina from Europe for his federal criminal case on June 20, 2003 with not 1 but 2 federal criminal cases merged into 1 federal court that his federal judge could Order the revocation of MacEnroe’s bail and have him immediately imprisoned until such time as a Pre-Release Hearing might establish even more facts delving into his 2 federal criminal cases, which may see no release for him whatsoever. In-addition to facing that, MacEnroe was advised by his European attornies that he would not be allowed to transport the financial and business records to the United States, which the U.S. federal criminal court judge had so ordered.

MacEnroe, facing all of the aforementioned, instructed his South Carolina, USA federal criminal defense attorney that if the U.S. government wanted his further cooperation on Middle Eastern affairs and elsewhere that they had better grant MacEnroe’s postponement.

MacEnroe was however seen by the Office of the U.S. Attorney and FBI as trying to play hardball with them through his criminal defense attorney and trying to minimize impacts two (2) federal criminal cases had on him by using a bargaining chip for his further ‘special financial business services’ for the government, which it decided to no longer pay the price MacEnroe had cost them.

The government decided to stop buying the MacEnroe storyline so on June 20, 2003 his federal criminal case in Greenville, South Carolina, USA saw his federal judge issue a warrant for MacEnroe’s arrest when he failed to appear in court even though MacEnroe had sent a medical emergency FAX to the Court alleging he was suffering symptoms of a nervous breakdown, which the judge didn’t accept.

Only a very small handful of people knew where Gabriel MacEnroe could be arrested from in Switzerland and elsewhere, and I happened to be one who had an inside family connection who was one of my information sources. I also knew MacEnroe had secured a "diplomatic passport" and an Eastern European country ‘economic citizenship passport’ that would eliminate his worries over being arrested by law enforcement while he was conducting financial business trade affair trips between Zurich, Switzerland and London, UK into St. Petersburg, Russia (CIS) and back.

So, while the FBI were winding their watches and scratching their butts, trying to mount an INTERPOL stop and detain order on Gabriel MacEnroe for them, he had already outwitted them in having escaped the so-called long arm of United States federal law, and escaped having to be imprisoned on two (2) U.S. federal criminal cases.

Would like to be provided names pertinent to the Liechtenstein Trust and Board members thereof, which you mentioned. There is a good possibility that the U.S. may not be seeking to arrest Gabriel MacEnroe but want his controllers to squirm and people’s monies returned that MacEnroe has been continually walking away with for many years.

Light years ahead of the FBI with my information on Gabriel MacEnroe, I can assure you that if I was communicating with them, he would never have even been allowed to leave Greenville, South Carolina on November 8th, 2000 on a reduced bail from $800,000 down to $200,000.

Important to research matters thoroughly, first, and believe you have an understanding of what work I do and have gathered to date.

In addition to the "name of the Trust" and/or any "individual names", might you recall ever having heard Gabriel Francis MacEnroe mention any names over his phones? He has 2 mobile phones that I know the makes, model numbers, and frequency ranges of already, one of which he just picked-up as new during May 2002.

Would like to know about the signatures on the FAXs I sent you a while back to determine which one belongs to MacEnroe and which one is false even though they both FAXs were used by Gabriel MacEnroe to transact financial business communications with you and others too.

Let's start with the 2 sets of FAXs I sent you to review, then information on his Lichtenstein affairs, and then go from there.

We have plenty of time to get to the more important information areas we’ve discussed.

Thank you, Mark.

Cordially yours,

-Paul

/

/

-------- Original Message --------

smail005@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:

From: smail005@sealand.pmmit.com
To: informant@seagold.net
CC: (no CC recipients)
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 18:29:05 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Dwelling Documents

Paul,

I don't know any names you haven't already mentioned.

I never knew the name of the Liechtenstein Trust Board of Directors that Gabriel MacEnroe took instructions from, but I do know that MacEnroe had to present everything he and I negotiated to the Liechtenstein Trust Board of Directors before moving ahead.

Gabriel MacEnroe and I would meet to discuss: Terms, Timelines, and Contract Procedures. Then MacEnroe would go to meet his Trust Board of Directors in Liechtenstein and come back with changes or the next step procedures, and as time permitted because FIBG was not the only interest MacEnroe had.

One of your articles mentioned an introduction to FIBG from a former Howard Hughes Trustee named William R. “Bill” Davis. As to who and what Davis was, may have been misrepresented by Davis, who worked for someone who may have been a Trustee on some of Howard Hughes affairs.

Davis was non-effectual and self-serving, with his business dealings, interfering, temperamental, and a down right pain in the butt.

Van Brink sent me to spend some time with Bill Davis because Brink had his fill of Davis over the years, and being a patient lad I spent a few days with Davis only to find he had plenty of stories surrounded by "Gods will".

The best thing Davis ever said was, "he was the son of Satan", referring to Gabriel MacEnroe, and this came of course came from Davis after MacEnroe corrected Davis for interfering in a meeting Van and I were having with MacEnroe.

Bill Davis claimed he spent a lot of his time signing people up in a religious “Club” he had been working on for many years. The Club gave Davis much control over what people did and got financial rewards for from Heaven. Very strange stuff, kind of like a preacher casting spells on the sheep to get them to donate their life’s work and wages.

Enuf for now, as this is stirring up plenty of spooks for me.

Regards,

mk

-------- Original Message --------

From: informant@seagold.net
To: smail005@sealand.pmmit.com
CC: (no CC recipients)
Date: Sun, Jun 29 2003 12:17:49 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Dwelling Documents

Hi Mark,

Hope your weekend was a good one. Thank you for writing, Mark.

William R. Davis, I believe was the name I mentioned in one of my articles. How was Davis becoming "a pain in the butt," as you referenced?

Did you ever hear any particular 'name' or 'company name' mentioned by Davis?

There was a Dr. B that Davis had met in Europe. Can you recall his name?

Any person's name or 'company name' that Davis might have mentioned, which referenced 'who' he got the name Gabriel MacEnroe from would be helpful.

Were you aware of any involvement whatsoever of Mr. Davis (as above) being involved in any way in the Indonesian gold project?

If so, please describe what the Indonesian gold project was all about that MacEnroe describes in the FAX to you dated 28FEB00.

Did you know the 'name' of the man who audited the Indonesian project for MacEnroe?

Do you know the 'name' or 'company name' of the assistant Davis brought in on that Indonesian gold project for MacEnroe?

What might you have known about the late Indonesia Premier Soekarno involvement in that Indonesian gold project MacEnroe was involved in from FIBG?

About the two (2) FAXs I sent you . . .

The signatures appear different to you, obviously. Could you explain which FAX actually bears Gabriel MacEnroe's true personal signature?

Could you explain who may have signed the other FAX perhaps, on his behalf, if you cannot recognize one of the two (2) distinctly different signatures?

Does either FAX bear Gabriel MacEnroe's true personal signature to your knowledge?

Could you clarify the contents described in the FAX dated 28FEB00? Who was Mr. Fielden actually to represent? What did "Abba Technology" actually represent? What was "software" meant to specifically represent?

What was MacEnroe trying to actually tell you in the FAX dated 28FEB00? Was he speaking in 'code' with you by using names of anyone or companies that actually meant other people or organizations that you and he had previously discussed before?

I will wait to see how you respond to those basic questions before I explain some other things to you, which you no doubt will want to know.

Thank you, Mark. Keep up the good work.

Cordially,

-Paul

/

/

-------- Original Message --------

====

CIRCA: 2004

[NOTE: Intercepted e-mails (use LEGEND above).]

-------- Original Message --------

From: smail005@sealand.pmmit.com
To: informant@seagold.net
CC: (no CC recipients)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:00:26 -0800 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Dwelling Documents

Paul,

I can definitely attest that FBI agents in Puerto Rico discussed Gabriel MacEnroe with me, and that I presented a biography on COMMERCIAL CAPITAL ESTABLISHMENT in Liechtenstein with the name Gabriel MacEnroe on it to government agents.

At the same time, I presented asset documentations that included a complete audit with bank information and explained to federal agents that Gabriel MacEnroe and I had changed-out the assets off the FIBG LTD. bank balance sheet because MacEnroe claimed there were “sensitive international considerations” over the instruments I had given him.

The U.S. government agents listened to my presentation in the presence of FIBG LTD. bank local attorney agent Ms. Marion Suite along with my FIBG LTD. bank operations manager, Bill Kassis, at that time.

The government agents and attorney adjudicated for 4-hours and then presented me with a “Letter Of Approval.”

The only time Gabriel MacEnroe ever raised his voice to me was after I sent him a scathing FAX complaining of his missing our appointment and his not calling to explain why. Later, MacEnroe told me he was having a blood transfusion at the hospital and showed me his arm with needle injection marks as proof. He responded angrily, but perhaps appropriately so, I apologized and never heard about it again from him.

I have not spoken to reporters since I testified at the Grand Jury in Portland, Oregon. Before, I had to correct 1 reporter who writes on the Internet but when he began asking too many questions I ended the discussion.

Sometime we may get an opportunity to discuss the facts.

Best Regards,

Mark Kennedy

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: The assets we can prove up on, even at this late date of four to eight years after the fact
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:34:59 +0000 (UTC)
From: sonso@sealand.pmmit.com
To: infocooperative@sealand.pmmit.com
Cc: paco@sealand.pmmit.com

You have not read this message before

Body of message:

Early days:

1. Assets rented via Gerard Beeman as 3:1 asset blocking for IDIC. This info will no doubt be in the truckload of boxes delivered to each defense attorney, since all First Bank info was turned over to the FBI. But probably easier if we get in contact with Gerard directly, at:

valacasa@sealand.pmmit.com

or,

Through his wife's twin sons (from her previous marriage):

richierich@sealand.pmmit.com

2. Mexican real estate. There were a few generations of assignments, each at a successively lesser amount in billions. First assignment was to FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL BANK INC., around $65-billion worth as assets under management. Last assignment was to First Bank. Can't remember how many billions. I might have access to the info on the last assignment. Am checking that out now.

The Baja, California real estate was put forward by, Dr. William M. McKnight. I think I have his phone number still. I think he lives in Texas. But could be pulled-in, first by affidavit, to say what it was he originally assigned to FIDELITY, and if necessary later as a witness should it go to trial.

3. In the days of Fidelity we also received three assignments totalling $60 billion from Walter Wellman (Wellman Mining or some such company name), gold reserves in Montana, if I remember correctly. We kept $20 billion at Fidelity (then moved it to First Bank), plugged $20 billion onto IDIC balance sheet, then another $20 billion onto the balance sheet of another IBC we owned, I think STANDARD SURETY & GUARANTEE.

Wellman came to us from Bill Siegfried. Siegfried dies. Then Wellman died. While I was still CEO at First Bank I think Armstrong Mertyl referred the executor of the Wellman estate to me asking that those assignments be returned since the bank had not done anything with any of them. By that time we had so much in other assigned assets OWNED by the bank outright that I wasn't concerned with those "assets under management" and so I made assignments back to the executor of the Wellman estate.

All of that also has to be in the records of what the FIBG Liquidator turned over to the FBI (unless all such files were purged from bank records during the Garvey Louison and Errol Thomas administrations of the bank prior to the court ordering involuntary liquidation).

But I think I could put Paul on the task of tracking down Armstrong Mertyl, and he'd come up with him in a day or two. Armstrong could probably direct us to who was the executor of the Wellman estate. We could see if some sort of affidavit on what had been returned from the bank could be produced. I'll cc Paul on this e-mail (Sealand user name: Paco). Paul, btw, is the one who wrote the e-mail I forwarded earlier about the importance of getting the Grand Jury transcripts.

4. Yellow sand. I read through the indictment and at one point it references a negotiation Bob was in with Jeff Hall for the assignment of some mined ore (yellow sand) that Bob was suggesting to me via fax could be stated as an owned asset by Fidelity or First Bank (I think First Bank, but I can't remember for sure). In the week before he was kidnapped at gunpoint by the FBI (i.e. arrested), Bob sent me an e-mail that Jeff keeps making contact and offering to put Bob and I into the gold refinery business with as much of the yellow sand as we can process - also giving us the info on how to assemble the technology to do it (that Jeff has finished perfecting) and knowing that Bob and I would see to it that the results were made to benefit the restoration of the bank's depositors. The indictment claims that fax from Bob to me was wire fraud.

Easy enough for Jeff to make available a big pile of that as a demonstration of what was available to the bank, and abandoned by the bank, when it pulled away from funding the development project. Also easy enough for Jeff to have some assays performed on random samples (performed by a credible assay firm) and to make that info available to us-- and we could even pull in expert witnesses.

So the above, plus the other documented asset info we have, should more than cover the fact that the bank did have assets under management and also assets of its own.

rms@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
---------begin original message---------
>
> We're going to have to do better than reasonable doubt to get this
> thing thrown out in advance... we need something going back to the
> early days... (in my opinion).
>
> My other concern: If it IS left up to a jury, will they be
> sophisticated enough to sit thru hours and hours of argument and
> testimony about this or that "asset" and not just be miffed about
> innocent Americans losing their hard-earned money and Rita's $60k
> private jet rental, or Bob's million dollar home, and tanning bed,
> (not to mention that "palace")...
>
> I think we need VOLUMES of documents regarding as many of the assets > (from early to later) in order to make an impact on this prosecutor..
> (and the judge). We need a barrage of documents proving up on the
> "billions" worth of assets the bank claimed on the books. Missi
>
>
> smail005@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
>
> ---------begin original message---------
> >
> > Yes, Gerald was exposed to the SHERWOOD assets but the exposure was
> > a lead event, I hand fed each document with a detailed explanation
> > that rounded the sharp edges. Gerald voiced his concern to Doug and
> > did not write a letter. The performance took less than a hour. Doug
> > went on faith, trust and goodwill.
> >
> > When the Brazil Soya and Mine trading papers were presented,
> > Gerald Burton and Marion Suite were given the entire documents,
> > instructions to lock themselves in her office until they both were
> > satisfied of the assets validity and value. Gerald responded with his
> > written statement, and a verbal "never have I felt more comfortable with
> > this relationship before this". Marion Suite voiced her confidence to
> > the Grenada government and that was supposed to buy enuf time
> > to finish an audit (Adrian Ball's). Richard Downes was in the
> > process of an outside audit on one or both of these assets. The
> > Soya futures came with an insurance policy, etc., etc.
> >
> > You don't have to prove validity back to the beginning, only
> > reasonable doubt. If it was a true bank, with a true guarantee at
> > any time, it could have always been. Or maybe I watch too much TV.
> >
> > If the DAI-ICHI yen cheques and CREDIT SUISSE through UBS assets
> > from SHERWOOD were so bad, why was MacEnroe so bent on getting them
> > off the books? If First Bank was an empty shell why would so much
> > effort be needed to toss the "Evil Van Brink Criminal Mastermind".
> >
> > There was always some substance, maybe not enuf for 10-to-1 but
> > enough to be on track. Our inability to get liquid with the asset
> > base we had was the failure of the bank. Not Management, not fraud,
> > not anything but a stone wall. We could have stolen more than any
> > of us could spend and there still would have been money left over.
> >
> > Your very actions today prove my point, the issue to restoration is
> > liquidity, not management, not value, not skill. You are still
> > pounding the same wall you pounded at First Bank.
> >
> > Sorry for the sermon.
> >
> > mk
> >
> > sonso@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
> >
> > ---------begin original message---------
> > >
> > > Gerald Burton, Marion Suite, Lawrence Jones, and Adrian Ball may
> > > have been exposed to the Brazilian mine, Soya futures, and the
> > > BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI $500-M (that would have been in 2000),
> > > but Gerald also signed off in 1998/1999 when we were touting
> > > $300-M cash at BANK OF TAIWAN, $8.7-B at UBS, and $3.8 billion
> > > DAI-ICHI, etc. in 1998 and 1999.
> > >
> > > Van
> > >
> > > smail005@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
> > >
> > > ---------begin original message---------
> > > >
> > > > Don't forget the mine in Brazil, at least it was there when I
> > > > was there, also $500-M. Even if you don't retain the asset it
> > > > was there and presented to IDIC lawyer + Marion Suite, +
> > > > Lawrence Jones + Adrian Ball. The two assets that Doug’s lawyer > > > > signed off on were the mine in Brazil and Soya futures.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the confused message I am in a rush.
> > > >
> > > > mk
> > > >
> > > > sonso@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ---------begin original message---------
> > > > >
> > > > > Missi wrote: “If we can prove up on some of the assets this
> > > > > whole case can and will likely be dropped.”
> > > > >
> > > > > Bingo.
> > > > >
> > > > > There was no fraud if the bank did have assets. The bank did
> > > > > have assets.
> > > > >
> > > > > Prove up one and we more than create reasonable doubt. Prove
> > > > > up 10:1 vs. $125.3 million in deposits (what the government's
> > > > > expert witness has stated the amount of deposits to be) and
> > > > > we have a case of malicious prosecution.
> > > > >
> > > > > At that point, I would think we would have prestigious law
> > > > > firms begging to make suit against the government for
> > > > > billions (and offering to do so on a contingency fee basis,
> > > > > nothing up front from us).
> > > > >
> > > > > Yet another way of accomplishing Restoration, I guess.
> > > > > Hmmm...had never thought of having the government fund the
> > > > > Restoration Project. Now THAT would be poetic justice.
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's see... $125.3 million times 10 = $1.253 billion we need
> > > > > to prove up.
> > > > >
> > > > > $855 million in soya futures + $500 million in BANK OF
> > > > > TOKYO-MITSUBISHI letter of credit = $1.355 billion.
> > > > > Interesting, no?
> > > > >
> > > > > Then there's also the possibility of proving the $3.8 billion
> > > > > in DAI-ICHI KANGYO cheques. Might be worth it to have a
> > > > > private investigator look up John Taylor and Lawrence Jones.
> > > > > Frosting on the cake.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Finding" in our favor at 10:1 as damages certainly has a
> > > > > ring to it.
> > > > >
> > > > > How many top-flight law firms out there wouldn't fight the
> > > > > government for a contingency fee of $413,490,000?
> > > > >
> > > > > Van
> > > > >
> > > > > rms@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------begin original message---------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Still no attorney on retainer for Bob, the best I've been
> > > > > > able to do has been get one to tell me $50,000 to start
> > > > > > (half what he thinks will be necessary). They all seem to
> > > > > > think we can pull the rug out from the conspiracy charges
> > > > > > if we can prove up on some of the assets, but it will take
> > > > > > doing our own investigation and bringing in (and paying
> > > > > > for) expert witnesses. If we can prove up on some of the
> > > > > > assets this whole case can and will likely be dropped.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Missi
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------begin original message---------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello Missi and Van: I spoke to my lawyer today, the one
> > > > > > > whose name I sent you. He would be happy to see Missi and
> > > > > > > said yes he has the copies of the documents there (that
> > > > > > > helped me) and would be happy to send them Lawyer to
> > > > > > > Lawyer to help you. I did mention getting him up on our
> > > > > > > email address so, Missi you can go ahead and call for an
> > > > > > > appointment to see him and get him set up on ZipLip.Com
> > > > > > > He knows your name and is expecting you to call him.
> > > > > > > Please give me his name on ZipLip once he is set up so I
> > > > > > > can contact him there. Today was a telephone conversation
> > > > > > > which I don’t like to do however it was necessary to get
> > > > > > > this ball rolling.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Van, I spoke to the gentleman regarding getting a hold of
> > > > > > > those papers we talked about. The fee has gone up to
> > > > > > > $2,000 and I feel sick about that because it’s the person
> > > > > > > you helped out a few years ago, French Canadian man
> > > > > > > Bill Kassis in regards to a mortgage, however my
> > > > > > > connection to him thinks its possible he has the originals
> > > > > > > of that documentation but I am not sure if that is what this
> > > > > > > fee will buy.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On another note, we are supposed to be at a wedding in
> > > > > > > California the week of the trial and to be honest I am
> > > > > > > not sure if I should go.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My Lawyer is checking it out for me whether I should
> > > > > > > leave Canada to enter U.S. or not.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If I do go my internet access will be minimal and we
> > > > > > > would be there for 10-days, 22nd-30th, but I will
> > > > > > > definitely check in on email daily.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just wanted you to know :) my dear wife Daisy is looking
> > > > > > > for a program that will allow us to get up easily in the
> > > > > > > U.S. and free, and she will take her laptop with her.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > SWU Injunearus
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > rms@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---------begin original message---------
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey you two, Missi here.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think I will still need some sort of an introduction
> > > > > > > > to your attorney. I mean I'm not opposed to winging it
> > > > > > > > and see where it goes but I can't imagine him meeting
> > > > > > > > with me without some sort of an introduction. And when
> > > > > > > > I do get thru to him, how much should I tell him?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I can probably get him enough information that he can
> > > > > > > > get a trial at Seamail but someone will still need to
> > > > > > > > contact him regarding what is his email name etc.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Someone just tell me what to do. At this point I can
> > > > > > > > take orders but being creative is more of a challenge.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am off to 2 meetings today, one with Ian (has the
> > > > > > > > Rodin collection), he is a local attorney and officer
> > > > > > > > of the British consulate or something, but anyway I
> > > > > > > > wanted to speak to him about some of the strategy being
> > > > > > > > discussed here, and see if he will give me some input
> > > > > > > > regarding getting an attorney retained for Bob.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have several leads and have FedEx a copy of the
> > > > > > > > indictment to one already.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Then I will be meeting with Royce, who had some ideas
> > > > > > > > which he didn't share with me over the phone, but says
> > > > > > > > he can help somehow. We'll see.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Spoke with Bob this morning. I obviously can't tell him
> > > > > > > > anything because they record the calls and he
> > > > > > > > understands that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I told him to stay strong, hide in the shelter of the
> > > > > > > > wing of the Lord and trust that God's purposes are
> > > > > > > > INTACT and allow those on the outside who love him to
> > > > > > > > get him out.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That will be hard for him, he is always the thinker and
> > > > > > > > the "doer", but maybe there will be a lesson in this
> > > > > > > > for him in that regard.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > At any rate, I'll be following up with 4 names of
> > > > > > > > attorneys that have been suggested to me and will keep
> > > > > > > > you posted.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please forward to me all the things (discussions,
> > > > > > > > documents, etc) that you think will help, as I am
> > > > > > > > keeping a file to give to the attorney once I have one
> > > > > > > > retained.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Missi
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > sonso@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ---------begin original message---------
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So, if called as prosecution witnesses, their answers
> > > > > > > > > could be phrased to work in passing references that
> > > > > > > > > on cross examination could bring the relevant facts
> > > > > > > > > to light. Or am I missing something?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Van
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > daymaker@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ---------begin original message---------
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It could be a ploy of the prosecutor to call both
> > > > > > > > > > Mark and Richard as their witnesses -- which would
> > > > > > > > > > relegate the defense to resorting to rebuttal and
> > > > > > > > > > cross examination. That could blow up in the face
> > > > > > > > > > of the prosecution -- but just wanted to make the
> > > > > > > > > > point.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Dug
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > sonso@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ---------begin original message---------
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Richard-
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the info. I'm sure Missi will follow
> > > > > > > > > > > up.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Missi- your attorney can set up a trial account
> > > > > > > > > > > at Seamail (and we will then have it set to paid
> > > > > > > > > > > up status - when you tell us the user name) by
> > > > > > > > > > > going to:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Sealand.PMMIT.Com (no need to put www. in front
> > > > > > > > > > > of Sealand )
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Click on "Enter our Secure E-mail Services"
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Click on "Create Trial Account"
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Then just do it.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Van
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ---------begin original message---------
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Van:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > First of all myself being in Canada makes it
> > > > > > > > > > > > very difficult for me to contact my Lawyer in
> > > > > > > > > > > > Portland in order to communicate with him.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Would it be possible for Missi to go there and
> > > > > > > > > > > > introduce herself in regards to getting him up
> > > > > > > > > > > > on the internet Sealand so I can communicate
> > > > > > > > > > > > with him? My Lawyer being hooked in to our
> > > > > > > > > > > > internet site would give me a much better way
> > > > > > > > > > > > to talk to him as I am not able to make long
> > > > > > > > > > > > distance phone calls, just restricted use of
> > > > > > > > > > > > phone locally. His name is Mr. Mark Sussman
> > > > > > > > > > > > Esq., 1906 S.W. Madison Street, Portland,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Oregon, 97205. Telephone no.:503-221-0520,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Fax: 503-221-1908. Please let me know if this
> > > > > > > > > > > > can happen ASAP.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the GRANGERAL Soya export plan
> > > > > > > > > > > > document begun in September 1999 via Banco
> > > > > > > > > > > > Barclays in Sao Paolo, Brazil with Wofsi Yuri G.
> > > > > > > > > > > > de Souza [ w-yuri@tba.com.br ] and I during
> > > > > > > > > > > > November 24, 1999 signed November 12, 1999
> > > > > > > > > > > > with assignment directly to FIBG. FYI I met with
> > > > > > > > > > > > a friend this morning that hopefully can contact
> > > > > > > > > > > > the holder of those documents you mentioned
> > > > > > > > > > > > wanting in your email to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > He said he would do his best to get them but
> > > > > > > > > > > > The reality is that people involved with those
> > > > > > > > > > > > documents are also under investigation for
> > > > > > > > > > > > similar charges, and if they prove wrongdoing
> > > > > > > > > > > > it may not be expedient of you to be
> > > > > > > > > > > > connected to that paper. This investigation
> > > > > > > > > > > > regarding those papers began about 1-year
> > > > > > > > > > > > ago.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > My lawyer Marc Sussman has the copy of a
> > > > > > > > > > > > Deed of Assignment out of Brazil dated
> > > > > > > > > > > > January 26, 2000 for $328-million.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > That’s why I want to be able to contact him to
> > > > > > > > > > > > authorize him to release information to the
> > > > > > > > > > > > other Defending Lawyers. I believe it is very
> > > > > > > > > > > > necessary to go Lawyer to Lawyer as the U.S.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Department of Justice did mention me
> > > > > > > > > > > > possibly being a witness for them.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully we can find something to help. We are
> > > > > > > > > > > > definitely praying for wisdom, accuracy,
> > > > > > > > > > > > clarity of mind, and Peace regarding all that
> > > > > > > > > > > > they are facing.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > We were so happy to hear, or should I say see,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Missi’s message regarding her strength and
> > > > > > > > > > > > courage. Thanks for sharing that with us as
> > > > > > > > > > > > they have been very much on our hearts.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Bye for now. Get some rest and KNOW that IF it
> > > > > > > > > > > > were POSSIBLE, we would send you a 747 full of
> > > > > > > > > > > > Egg McMuffins :))) bye for now.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > SWS Injunearus
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > sonso@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ---------begin original message---------
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Soya papers,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I spent more than 5-hours today uploading
> > > > > > > > > > > > > attachments to send to those directly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > involved with my fellow indictees in the case
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of The United States v Van Brink, et al.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Someone is sending me a copy of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > indictment.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I haven't seen it, as yet. It is 75 pages
> > > > > > > > > > > > > plus attachments.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The charges are mail fraud, wire fraud,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > unjust enrichment from the proceeds of crime,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > forfeiture (of those items found that were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > purchased with the proceeds of crime),
> > > > > > > > > > > > > conspiracy and money laundering.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > As noted, I have not read the indictment.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > But as I think of what it could be (and the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > U.S. Attorney seems to be regarding the fact
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that Bob Skirving bought a nice home out of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > his earnings, Rita Regale purchased a nice
> > > > > > > > > > > > > car and some private jet trips out of her
> > > > > > > > > > > > > earnings – all the from the proceeds of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "crime"), the PRELIMINARY POINT that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > government needs to establish is that there
> > > > > > > > > > > > > was the commission of the intentional crime
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of defrauding the bank's depositors (whom the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > government probably refers to as investors,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > although they were not shareholders in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > bank).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Was the bank a fraud?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Was IDIC a sham trying to make a fraud look
> > > > > > > > > > > > > good?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The government's case will rise and fall with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > its expert witness, FIBG liquidator Marcus
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Wide and his first two published reports as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Liquidator.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > So I sent out the two complete commentaries
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I wrote in response to Wide's first 2 FIBG
> > > > > > > > > > > > > liquidator reports, together with 34 other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > supporting documents.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Was Mr. Wide telling the truth in those 2
> > > > > > > > > > > > > reports (he will be called upon to swear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > under oath that he was).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Many of you will recall that I also spent the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > better part of a year working with Ira
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Samuel's Executive Committee as it outlined a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > case to bring against PricewaterhouseCoopers
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and Marcus Wide.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > That Executive Committee went through Wide's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > reports (and my rebuttal commentaries) with a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > fairly fine-toothed comb. Not only was an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > outline prepared on how to legally attack PWC
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and Mr. Wide, so too were working documents
> > > > > > > > > > > > > prepared on how to go about proving each of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the major points of the outline. I attached
> > > > > > > > > > > > > my copies of those working papers also.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > One paragraph nutshell:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > First Bank's asset structure was real. How
> > > > > > > > > > > > > real? IDIC independent legal counsel was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > satisfied that the bank had more than 10:1
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in assets vs. deposit liabilities. So too was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the bank's retained legal counsel. So to were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > outside experts, including other banks and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > insurance companies (as well as industry
> > > > > > > > > > > > > experts who worked with the bank in seeking
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to "place" some of its large assets to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > produce income for the bank.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Okay, it is more than a one-paragraph
> > > > > > > > > > > > > nutshell, since here is another paragraph:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > We can demonstrate that in excess of 10:1 in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > FIBG assets were real.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Marcus Wide's contention that it was all
> > > > > > > > > > > > > bogus will be blown away in court (if it is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > allowed to go that far —- to the government's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and PWC's great embarrassment).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > With the asset structure being demonstrated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as 10:1 sufficient, IDIC was not a sham
> > > > > > > > > > > > > trying to make a fraud look good. There goes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the indictment against Doug Ferguson.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > With the asset structure being demonstrated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as 10:1 sufficient, the compensation paid to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry Barnabe for working in those companies
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that referred depositors to the bank was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > legitimately earned and was not the proceeds
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of crime and subjecting him to loss of his
> > > > > > > > > > > > > savings accounts. There goes the indictment
> > > > > > > > > > > > > against Larry Barnabe.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > With the asset structure being demonstrated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as 10:1 sufficient, the compensation paid
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Rita Regale (over the time she worked as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Chief Financial Officer for FIBG) really was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hers to do with as she pleased (including
> > > > > > > > > > > > > purchasing a really, really nice car and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > taking 3 private jet trips).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > With the asset structure being demonstrated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as 10:1 sufficient, the compensation paid to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Bob Skirving also WAS NOT the proceeds of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > crime, neither was his purchasing a really
> > > > > > > > > > > > > nice house a crime and subject to forfeiture
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (although I understand he lost the home in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > foreclosure some time ago).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > And with the asset structure being
> > > > > > > > > > > > > demonstrated as 10:1 sufficient, pretty
> > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult to say that I was the mastermind of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > crime (since no crime was committed) or that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > we were all involved in conspiracy with one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > another to commit the crime of defrauding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > depositors of their life's savings.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Money laundering?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The bank required this accompanying text on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > all incoming wires of deposit funds sent to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > us from the depositors' home banks:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "The remitter is known to us and we are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > satisfied as to the source of funds."
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > If commercial banks were certifying the funds
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as legitimate, how is it that we were "money
> > > > > > > > > > > > > laundering" – there is no need to launder
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "clean" funds. That allegation does not hold
> > > > > > > > > > > > > up either – not unless the government takes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the view that the money laundering occurred
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with the "proceeds of crime." But that view
> > > > > > > > > > > > > comes to nothing, if there was no crime of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > attempting to defraud depositors.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > So where does that leave us?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no doubt but that all of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > depositors are out all of their deposit
> > > > > > > > > > > > > funds.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > But was that the result of crimes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > having been committed on the parts of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > indicted to achieve that?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Or, was there a business failure that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > resulted in the financial loss of all?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hint:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Choose option "b."
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Was a crime committed? Yeah. But we don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > have to prove there was a criminal conspiracy
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to bring a viable banking system down.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > There are some dirty hands out there, but the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > indicted DO NOT have to convince a court to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > make sure those dirty hands are properly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > washed in prison.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > A waste of time and energy, as far as I'm
> > > > > > > > > > > > > concerned.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > If someone else wants to lead that parade,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that's not my call (nor is it my interest).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > To me a crime was committed and it needs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > setting right.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The perpetrators of that crime are not about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to set it right.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore, we will.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > That's what the Restoration Project and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Instauration Project is all about.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Forget persecutions, prosecutions and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > retributions.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Get to the real solution: Abundance flowing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as it should, as it can, and as it shall.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This is where we live. This is who we are.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This is what we do.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > So -- with most of a day spent on only these
> > > > > > > > > > > > > underlying nuisance matters, I turn back to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > an inbox in which I am only 65 e-mails
> > > > > > > > > > > > > behind. Full speed ahead.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > My best to you all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Van
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. Interesting that neither Richard Downes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > nor Mark Kennedy were indicted, is it not?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Both did appear before at least 1 Portland
> > > > > > > > > > > > > federal grand jury. Richard appeared twice.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark only once.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > As facts have it, AFTER they appeared, the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Assistant United States Attorney disbanded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that 2001 grand jury and constituted a new
> > > > > > > > > > > > > one and started over. Why?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Both Richard and Mark presented compelling
> > > > > > > > > > > > > evidence that the bank’s asset structure was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > quite credible and provable.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It would seem that the government couldn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > > use such testimony and evidence to bring
> > > > > > > > > > > > > about a criminal indictment like it was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hoping to do. So, Richard Downes and Mark
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Kennedy were each sent home, with: "Thanks.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > We don't have any more use for you as a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > witness. You're excused."
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Both Richard Downes and Mark Kennedy stand
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ready to testify on the reality of the asset
> > > > > > > > > > > > > structure the bank had (and to explain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > documentation, which demonstrates that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > reality).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > As I noted a few months ago, I owe Mark
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Kennedy my personal apologies for those
> > > > > > > > > > > > > things I wrote in 2000 and 2001 in which I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > questioned his integrity. I have thanked him
> > > > > > > > > > > > > privately, and do so now publicly again, for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > his patience with me through those difficult
> > > > > > > > > > > > > times.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Through the days and weeks (possibly months)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ahead, there likely will be renewed public
> > > > > > > > > > > > > name-calling in the media, "exposé" stories
> > > > > > > > > > > > > on what dirty rotten scoundrels the indicted
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 5 happen to be, etc.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Chins up. We will get through this. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > government's case rises and falls on the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > government's preliminary point that - with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > complete credibility - can be disproved in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > court, if the government,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > PricewaterhouseCoopers, and Marcus Wide -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > each and all wish to be ‘that’ embarrassed,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > respectively and collectively.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Van
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Restoration mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Restoration@seagold.net
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > https://www.seagold.net/mailman/listinfo/restoration
> > > > > > > > > > > > ---------end of original message---------
> > > > > > > > > > > ---------end of original message---------
> > > > > > > > > > ---------end of original message---------
> > > > > > > > > ---------end of original message---------
> > > > > > > > ---------end of original message---------
> > > > > > > ---------end of original message---------
> > > > > > ---------end of original message---------
> > > > > ---------end of original message---------
> > > > ---------end of original message---------
> > > ---------end of original message---------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > InfoCooperative mailing list
> > > InfoCooperative@seagold.net
> > > https://www.seagold.net/mailman/listinfo/infocooperative
> > ---------end of original message---------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > InfoCooperative mailing list
> > InfoCooperative@seagold.net
> > https://www.seagold.net/mailman/listinfo/infocooperative
> ---------end of original message---------
>
> _______________________________________________
> InfoCooperative mailing list
> InfoCooperative@seagold.net
> https://www.seagold.net/mailman/listinfo/infocooperative
---------end of original message---------

-------- Original Message --------

From: greg@seagold.net
To: reidlaw@sealand.pmmit.com, lawyerabn@sealand.pmmit.com, injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com
Cc:
Bcc: paco@sealand.pmmit.com
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 05:40:19 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: for your cogitator

1. Richard:

Please alert your attorney (Mr. Sussman) that Mssrs. Bob Reid and Jim Rice (both of Portland) are defense attorneys (respectively) for Van Brink and Doug Ferguson.

Either Mr. Reid or Mr. Rice will be contacting Mr. Sussman so, please release the documents regarding FBG and/or IDIC assets to them.

Richard, you may communicate directly, with:

Mr. Reid, at:

reidlaw@sealand.pmmit.com

or

Mr. Rice, at:

lawyerabn@sealand.pmmit.com

2. Mssrs. Reid and Rice:

Mr. Sussman was a federal court-appointed attorney for Richard Downes, former FIBG LTD. bank Chairman of the Board, when he was providing testimony and evidence before a Federal Grand Jury in Portland, Oregon.

Mr. Sussman was entrusted with documentation regarding assets I have never been privy to.

I have been told by Mr. Downes that the Sussman law firm may still be owed some money for services rendered, as I recall in the $2,000 range. Mr. Downes has been unable to pay this obligation.

You may communicate directly with Mr. Downes, at:

injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com

I thank all of you for your assistance in this matter.

Zig

-------- Original Message --------

From: injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com
To: reidlaw@sealand.pmmit.com, lawyerabn@sealand.pmmit.com, greg@seagold.net
Cc:
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:02:13 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: for your consideration

Gentleman,

I've emailed Marc Sussman that Mssrs. Bob Reid and Jim Rice (also of Portland) are Defense Attorneys for (respectively) Van Brink and Doug Ferguson.

For your information:

$2,000 IS NOT OWED TO MARC SUSSMAN, he was a public defender appointed to me.

See below:

The $500-M Letter Of Credit from BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBSHI that was Joint Ventured with FIBG has been held in a Las Vegas, Nevada storage since 1999. This is part of the evidence Van was looking for, and the $2,000 is simply needed to pay the storage fee so those files can be made available. Hopefully, they are the original documents.

I would love to help as much as I legally can however because of my position, I really feel that you Lawyers would be far better off to confer amongst yourselves. I simply don’t know what my legal boundaries are.

Marc Sussman knows whom we saw, and can tell you what you need to know.

I have great faith in him, and the other experts they assigned to the case. I don’t remember their names but Marc would.

I trust this will all go away quickly and for the good of all. I pray for Vans and Doug's release.

Richard Downes

-------- Original Message --------

From: eurotrustee@sealand.pmmit.com
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:43:34 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Re: help please...HELP!!!
To: injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com
Cc: (no CC recipients)
Bcc: paco@sealand.pmmit.com

You have not previously read this message

Body of message:

Richard,

1. I and many others are in the same financial position. I can attribute it to several things:

a.) The small group of faithful have been bled to death and have no more to contribute;

b.) Like some of the big FIBG deals I heard of, and then never happened, there has been a series of that type of thing over the now several years of the project; and,

c.) I am not as good as Van at fund raising;

As in last month at this time, I cannot send you what is not in the well.

2. One time I heard a name Van told Rita, maybe Bill … something, which brought negative remarks from Rita. Do you have any recollections?

Thanks

-Zig-

injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:

---------begin original message---------

ZIG

Early asset? I didn't come on board FIBG until Oct 1998, to acquire assets for the bank. Everything that was brought by our group were all verified by FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL BANK INC. and IDIC lawyers, and after that by FIBG accounting firms hired to do the audits each year after that. Approximately $65-billion USD.

Howard Hughes: One of the FIBG IBCs owned a Howard Hughes vault storage complex in Las Vegas, Nevada.

The $500-M Letter Of Credit from BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI J.V. with FIBG has been held in storage since 1999. This is the evidence Van was looking for, and the $2,000 is simply needed to pay the storage fee so the files can be made available. Hopefully they’re originals of the documents.

My lawyer (Sussman) in Portland has 2 groups of assets that total over $1.255-billion, which never showed in PWC's audit. Interesting? Even more interesting is that Claire Fay has the originals of what my lawyer has. The rest should be handled lawyer to lawyer.

HELP HELP in regards to SAM ! While I'd love to pay this $2,000 fee I don't even have monies for gas. I've stretched everything I can, and everything starts again on the 31 of August. YIKES!!!!!

SWU - Injunearus

eurotrustee@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:

---------begin original message---------

Richard,

Like many others I toss and turn instead of sleeping sometimes.

I have been racking my (feeble) brains about early assets and players, but I have the handicap of never working the asset side of things.

There was a guy I heard-of in a couple of brief conversations, something about telecommunications, but I recall something about Howard Hughes or former employees. Do you have any insights as to whom I am trying to remember? Anything else that might be helpful would sure be appreciated.

I am no attorney, but is seems to me the whole cases is based upon no assets. If we can prove otherwise, it could make the whole thing go away before the trial, a real relief for even the 5,000 that haven't been indicted.

Thanks much

-Zig-

-------- Original Message --------

From: eurotrustee@seagold.net
To: injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com
CC: (no CC recipients)
Bcc: paco@sealand.pmmit.com
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:15:35 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: help please...HELP!!!

You have not previously read this message

Body of message:

Thanks.

Okay so, what do you know about this Bill Davis guy?

What did he bring to the table?

-Zig-

injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:

---------begin original message---------

HI Zig:

Whoa brother!

I didn’t mean to offend you by, asking why you wanted their names. I was just curious if you thought there might be some answers there.

I’m on your side, and believe me, I feel terrible about them Van et al being in jail. I love Van and Doug and Bob and the rest and when they are hurting so am I.

SWU - Injunearus

eurotrustee@seagold.net wrote:

---------begin original message---------

Why?

My brother and good friend is in jail. 5 are pending trial. There could yet be more superceding indictments handed down naming yet additional people.

When something nags at my sleep, I wonder why and like to ask those who may know something helpful!

It could be nothing but trivia, I understand. I regard you as a person who would be in the know.

Bingo, you hit the nail on the head, Bill Davis. I once heard Rita object to Van when Van said to send Bill Davis some expense money. Credit where credit due, Rita did a good job of trying to protect Van from himself money wise.

What deals or input, referrals, etc. did Bill Davis bring to the table? By the tone of Rita's voice, she thought he was pure b.s., but then we both know Rita.

Thanks -z-

injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:

---------begin original message---------

Hello Zig:

I can understand your comments regarding empty well but I choose to believe it will be full soon :) as I am sure you do too.

Regarding #2, the only names I can recall at this time that had a given name 'Bill' would be:

Bill Kassis was the manager of the Grande Anse Hotel in Grenada; or,

Bill Davis, independent player.

I have no idea how to get in touch with these people.

But if I may ask, "Why would you want to know their names??”

SWU – Injunearus

-------- Original Message --------

From:
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:52:44 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: help please...HELP!!!
To: CC: (no CC recipients)

You have not previously read this message

Body of message:

Thanks much

-Zig-

injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:

---------begin original message---------

Hi Zig:

I was only aware of Davis bringing hospital deals. Sorry I can’t help more.

SWU - Injunearus

eurotrustee@seagold.net wrote:

---------begin original message---------

Richard,

Thanks much!

Was it Davis bringing hospital deals, or others?

Zig

injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:

---------begin original message---------

Hi Zig:

Yes there were hospital deals always in the wings from Davis but none that ever completed that I am aware of. Actually I have never heard or seen any finalized transaction come from him.

Davis used to converse with Mark Kennedy so you may want to check it out with him.

SWU – Injunearus

eurotrustee@seagold.net wrote:

---------begin original message---------

Richard,

Wasn't there some sort of hospital deal he was involved in?

How about, some communications company?

Thanks.

-zig-

injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com wrote:

---------begin original message---------

Zig,

Ok. Bill Davis is the one that brought McEnroe to the table to my best recollection.

Davis had projects to do, but I never saw anything completed by him.

Davis used to show up in the strangest places. Almost as if he had followed me around the globe, but I cant prove that.

SWU - Injunearus

-------- Original Message --------

From: eurotrustee@seagold.net
To: injunearus@sealand.pmmit.com
CC: (no CC recipients)
Bcc: paco@seagold.net
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 19:03:10 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: help please...HELP!!!

You have read this message before

Body text:

This is consistent with Rita's (circa 1998 conversation) opinion of Davis, always needing expense money, never bringing anything to the table that worked.

Zig

-------- Original Message --------

CIRCA: 2005

[NOTE: Intercepted e-mail messages (use LEGEND above).]

From: eurotrustee@safe-mail.net
To: Paco
Subject: Parrying
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:43:21 –0400

Chad Perry was not a sales representative. FIBG had no sales representatives even though the governments would like to assert such. Marketing was handled by an independent Grenada firm called ASSET RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIAIES LTD. ( ARDA ), supervised by Larry Barnabe.

I doubt if Perry was even contracted through ARDA, as he was on payroll as an administrative assistant to Richard Downes at FIBG.

Whether Downes and Perry were acting in behalf of FIBG or proposing to rent the DAI-ICHI check assets from FIBG to conduct a private deal on Pearce’s yacht I do not know. Richard told me that he was excited about buying a yacht for FIBG before the negotiations failed.

Would be nice if you would drop mentioning EQUITY RETIREMENT DISTRIBUTORS LTD. with Perry because he is Allan Sanford’s Canadian pet for business registrations in Canada.

What do you think?

Zig

-------- Original Message --------

[NOTE: Intercepted e-mail, edited (below)]

Ref: N1-TYYmWg1G
Subject: Re: early dual tracks
Date: 03 May 2005 08:14
From: James Gregory Ziegler < euroz@safe-mail.net >
To: Gary Wilson Lacy < investtlarimore@safe-mail.net > [claimed-held highest security clearance with U.S. National Security Agency (NSA)]
Cc: (none)

JGZ: Where things get fuzzy is where, when, how, the assets were removed from FIBG, and then re-used. It is easy to see that Mark Kennedy turned them over in full or in-part to Gabriel McEnroe;

GWL: Yes, given the FAXs from MacEnroe acknowledging receipt.

JGZ: But then, enter Lawrence Jones, Esq. and his sleeping with Dr. Keith Mitchell including the proposed FIBG 2000. By appearances, Dennis Broska used part of FIBG big assets for the capitalizat1on. Part of the capitalization required was US $750-K, or $1-M, whatever it was had been reduced from the $2-M + in 1997.

GWL: My hunch would be that after the ruby debacle, Grenada would have wanted to see all cash. Therefore I suspect that RENAISSANCE INTERNATIONAL BANK put up the cash. When asked who was behind FIBG 2000, Ms. Marion Suite Esq. reported "RENAISSANCE INTERNATIONAL BANK" while Lawrence Jones, Esq. remained moot as to who was behind it.

JGZ: By the way, Richard Downes denies having anything to do with FIBG 2000 much less being a Director. Any light here would be appreciated. Can you please shed any light on this? Thanks much.

GWL: Downes may be telling the truth, as he seemed genuinely puzzled by the announcement he was a director of FIBG 2000. It also makes no sense, given the Grenada government claimed it had no way to contact former FIBG people, despite having received then-recent letters from Downes, Tai, Van, Doug addressed to various officials. The claim that the directors of FIBG 2000 were the same as FIBG was made by PM Mitchell's press secretary, but later when confronted with the Press-obvious "You've gotta be kidding" response, Mitchell's office denied that such was the case and that their Press Secretary had misspoken. Far be it from me to trust the word of government officials, without proof, but in this particular case I think his Press Secretary indeed got it screwed up. I would be truly surprised if FIBG 2000 had been set up with Downes, or any former director on its Board, given the fraud allegations already circulating. That would have been an incredible move. I suspect that Jones, Butler, and Broska would be the ones to look at as far as directors are concerned.

JGZ: At one point I was included in some Yahoo chats with Van, Doug, Melissa Skirving, Cecelia Martin, and Richard Hite. Hard to believe we actually used Yahoo, but oh well.

I recall Missi relating she had a conversation with Lawrence Jones concerning FIBG 2000 after Grenada announced its licensing. So, this would have been October 2000. She reached him at his hotel in Grenada, and asked what the hell was going on with this new bank.

Jones replied it was constituting something called a "hive down" maneuver, she did not recognize the legal term so perhaps got it wrong, in which assets of a company under legal duress (as FIBG was with the Mareva injunctions) are moved to a new company so the new company can use them to make money to cover the old company's debts.

Given what we know about the Jones and Taylor confirmation on the DAI-ICHI cheques, I have always thought that this was as good as a confession from Lawrence Jones that those assets were indeed moved into FIBG 2000.

Jones did not say anything about who was behind the new license, and indeed told Missi he couldn't reveal that. I am obviously relating something to you third-hand, but if the directors were the same, Jones would have said as much to Melissa.

Further discussion in the Yahoo chat revolved around the issue as to whether this FIBG 2000 idea was a good thing or not. No one was sure.

It definitely raised questions as to whom Lawrence Jones was really playing for.

GWL: Van's position was, it was just fine if Lawrence Jones wanted to work on a rescue plan in parallel with them while they had their own rescue package going on to hypothecate the BANK OF TOKYO MITSUBISHI $500-M Letter Of Credit with FIBG LTD. bank JV guarantees through BOSPI that were insurance wrapped. Later, there was a notion that Errol Thomas scuttled this with his fumbling on the Key Test TELEX machine, but the $3.8-billion (USD) DAI-ICHI checks were to be positioned to occasion confirmations for guarantees. The DAI-ICHI checks were later believed moved in making FIBG 2000, which would have been an act of fraud. If that was so, then Van was being much too cavalier as to Lawrence Jones' activities being "harmless" and in "happy parallel with their own efforts."

---------end of original message---------

- - - -

RESEARCH NOTES

[NOTE: FIBG LTD. Bank - High-Value Assets (Partial List Below)]

TAB #3

DAI-ICHI KANGYO BANK CO. LTD. Bank Cheques $3.8-Billion (USD):

1. Investment & Humanitarian Projects Agreement with Transaction Code #KBUZU-OKA-27398-B3.8$

- Agreement between Kazutoshi Okazaki & John (Hans) Zuecher and SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (Bahamas)

- B/W Copy of Cheque # 871 (AI 57602) and 872 (AI 57602) front and back.

- B/W Copy of Zurcher passport (front, back, and inside).

- B/W Copy of Okazaki's Passport.

[12-Pages]

2. Schedule "A" Deed of Assignment with transaction code #KBUZU-OKA-27398-B3.8$

- Deed of Assignment Mr. Kazutoshi Okazaki Present Owner & Attorney-In-Fact, Mr. John (Hans) Zuecher for the benefit of SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (Bahamas) and / or SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (Bahamas) duly appointed administrator, MUTUAL ASSETS LIMITED.

- Official Certification B No. 2087/2088 (Certifying signatures of Hans Zurcher and Kazutoshi Okazaki).

[3-Pages]

3. Deed of Assignment (made November 18th, 1998)

- Deed of Assignment from SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (Bahamas) and FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LIMITED of the two (2) DAI-ICHI KANGYO BANK CO. LTD. cheques No. 871 (AI 57602) and No. 872 (AI 57602).

[2-Pages]

4. Joint Venture Agreement (made November 18, 1998) Transaction code No. SHER-FI-JV-181198

- JV between SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (Bahamas) and FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LIMITED under transaction code No. SHER-FI-JV-181198.

- Amendment to the Agreement under transaction code No. SHER-FI-JV-181198 made July 20th, 1999 adding GENESIS HOLDINGS CORP. to the Joint Venture.

[7-Pages]

5. General Power of Attorney

- Showing the authority of Mr. Kazutoshi Okazaki specifically for the two (2) DAI-ICHI KANGYO cheques.

- Showing the authority of Mr. Kazutoshi Okazaki on a total of four (4) different cheques.

[4-Pages]

6. Letter of Intent

- Signed by Mr. Takeharu Okitsu, Mr. Tetsuro Saito, and Mr. Kazutoshi Okazaki.

[1-Page]

7. Affidavit

- Declaration of Ownership by Mr. Kazutoshi Okazaki.

[1-Page]

8. Certification

- Certifies Mr. Kazutoshi Okazaki to have authority over the two (2) cheques signed by two (2) at The Finance Ministry of Japan.

[1-Page]

9. B/W Copy of cheque # 871 (AI 57602) and 872 (AI 57602)

- Front and back

[2-Pages]

10. Confirmation Documentation

- Issued to BARCLAYS BANK PLC confirming authenticity, signatory bank officers who signed the cheques, etc. signed by Ryutaro Hashimoto, Prime Minister of Japan.

- Issued to Mr. Karel Timmermans (confidential) confirming authenticity of the cheques on behalf of the Japanese Government singed by Ryutaro Hasimoto, Prime Minister of Japan.

- Issued to Whom It May Concern confirming authenticity of the cheques on behalf of the Japanese Finance Department singed by Mr. Sadakazut Tanigaki.

[3-Pages]

- - - -

RESEARCH NOTES

[NOTE: DAI-ICHI KANGYO BANK CO. LTD. cheque signatory names (below)]

RE: Mr. Takeharu Okitsu

J-POWER PRIVITIZATION FUND CO. LTD.
15-1, Ginza 6-chome, Chuo-ku
Tokyo 104-8165
Japan
TEL: +81 3 3546-2211
WWW: http://www.jpower.co.jp

Executive Director (2nd from top): Takeharu Okitsu (As of: July 2003)

Reference

http://www.jpower.co.jp/english/company_info/about/kaisya/

- - - -

JAPAN SECURITIES DEPOSITORY CENTER (JASDEC)

Managing Director: Takeharu Okitsu (As of: October 1999)

Reference

http://kessaicenter.com/joto/2_e.pdf

- - - -

RE: Mr. Tetsuro Saito

[NOTE: NIHON UNISYS LEARNING LTD. was founded on July 1, 2002 exclusively for providing consultation services for various training and human resource development programs based on e-learning. In pursuing this mission, it can make full use of the vast store of know-how accumulated by NIHON UNISYS over a period of more than 30-years and energies of the parent's experts in human resource development. The seamless linkage of its e-learning services in e-learning, with those of NAIS-IS in contents distribution, will enable it to furnish learning support and content distribution services to NAIS-IS customers. With a view to complementing the contents offered by NAIS-IS, it will be supplying more than 200 titles in areas including computer literacy, IT, business skills, and human skills. Due to the collaboration with NAIS-IS, it can give full play to its e-learning business experience and know-how, and further cultivate the e-learning market in the Kansai region.]

11 December 2002

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC WORKS INFORMATION SYSTEMS CO. LTD. (NAIS-IS) [ 1048 Kadoma, Osaka Prefecture ] President Masahiro Hamada and NIHON UNISYS LEARNING LTD. President Tetsuro Saito [ 1-1-1 Toyosu, Koto Ward, Tokyo, Japan ] have agreed to collaborate in the development of business in distribution of e-learning contents beginning in December 2002.

The two companies intend to build a relationship of cooperation in a diversity of aspects by drawing on each other's strengths, and particularly NAIS-IS e-learning platform and the NIHON UNISYS LEARNING wealth of educational contents. The facets of partnership include the provision of solutions for human resource development encompassing both contents and e-learning infrastructure, and the construction of schemes for customer-specific knowledge learning.

NAIS-IS has formulated policy to expand its business in provision of human resource development solutions and utilization of corporate original know-how, which have good prospects for rapid demand and market growth over the coming years. It is targeting sales of 1-billion yen in the third year.

NIHON UNISYS LEARNING LTD. hopes to open up and expand the e-learning market in the Kansai region through the collaboration.

Reference

http://www.naisis.co.jp/english/news/pr021211e.html

- - - -

TAB #1

BANK OF JAPAN $47.5-Billion (Gold Bullion)

1. Investment & Humanitarian Projects Agreement with Transaction code #ATCF-KBUZU-0KA-250296-B47.5US$ signed by Mr. Kazutoshi Okasaki, Mr. John (Hans) Zuercher, and Craig L. Hubner.

[7-Pages]

1.1 Schedule "A"

- BANK OF JAPAN Custodial Receipt issued by Key Test TELEX only.

- Official Certification B No. 2083/2084 (Certifying signatures of Hans Zurcher and Kazutoshi Okazaki).

[4-Pages]

1.2 Schedule "B"

- Deed of Assignment transaction code #ATCF-KBUZU-OKA-250296-B47.5US$

From Mr. Hisao Sato (Present Owner) and Mr. Kazutoshi Okazaki (Present Owner & Attorney-In-Fact for Mr. Hisao Sato For the Benefit of SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (Bahamas) and / or SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (Bahamas) duly appointed administrator MUTUAL ASSETS LIMITED.

- Addendum to the Investment & Humanitarian Projects agreement with transaction code #ATCF-KBUZU-OKA-250296-B47.5US$ signed by Mr. Kazutoshi Okasaki, Mr. John (Hans) Zuercher, and Craig L. Hubner.

- Official Certification B No. 2094/2095 (Certifying signatures of Hans Zurcher and Kazutoshi Okazaki).

[4-Pages]

2. The Joint Venture Agreement under transaction code No. SHER-FI-JV-181198

- Joint Venture Agreement between SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (Bahamas) and FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LIMITED.

[5-Pages]

2.1 Amendment to Agreement transaction code No. SHER-FI-JV-181198

- Joint Venture Agreement including SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (Bahamas), FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LIMITED, and GENESIS HOLDING CORP.

[2-Pages]

2.2. Deed of Assignment (Made: July 23rd, 1999)

- Deed of Assignment of 47.5B from SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (Bahamas) to FIRST INTERNAT10NAL BANK OF GRENADA LIMITED.

[2-Pages]

- - - -

TAB #4

UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND (UBS) & CREDIT SUISSE $8.7-Billion Gold CDs & Bank Guarantees

1. Full Power of Attorney

- Pringgodigdo Estate by Prasetya Hadi (aka) Prasetya Purwanto.

[1-Page]

2. Irrevocable Deed of Assignment for the Unrestricted Management of Assets

- Certifies Prasetya Hadi (aka) Prasetya Purwanto having full authority over assets.

- Addendum to Irrevocable Deed of Assignment for the Unrestricted Management of Assets.

[3-Pages]

3. Copy of Safe Keeping Receipt

- Issued by BURL HOWARD SECURITIES CORPORATION to FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LIMITED.

[2-Pages]

4. Joint Venture Agreement

- Between BURL HOWARD SECURITIES CORPORATION and FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LIMITED.

[5-Pages]

5. B/W (Reduced) Copy of Certificates.

[12-Pages]

6. Color Laser Copies of Certificates

- Notary's Certification Letter.

[13-Pages]

- - - -

TAB #2

Wells Fargo boxes ( Morganthau Bonds with Chinese symbol ), KOBI sauna boxes, and Miscellaneous bank instruments in black coffin boxes valued at $10.3-Billion (USD)

1. Memorandum of Understanding & Humanitarian Project Agreement

- Between Dante Tadeo, Peralto / Reynaldo Acosta Laberinto, and GENESIS HOLDINGS CORP.

- B/W Copy of Craig L. Hubner passport.

- Certification of Craig L. Hubner signature.

[11-Pages]

2. Deed of Assignment made March 26th, 1999

- Deed of Assignment from GENESIS HOLDINGS CORP. to SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (Bahamas)

[2-Pages]

3. The Joint Venture Agreement under transaction code No. SHER-FI-JV-181198

- Joint Venture Agreement between SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LTD. (Bahamas) and FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LIMITED.

[5-Pages]

-------- Original Message --------

From: eurotrustee@safe-mail.net
To: bereal@safe-mail.net
Subject: Help please
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 11:25:10 -0400

Mark,

A defense investigator has asked my assistance on this.



QUESTIONS I would like to read ANSWERS about, from:

MR. MARK KENNEDY:

1. "Might you have ever spoken with a man named Gabriel MacEnroe?" If so, "What might the circumstances have been as to how and when you might have become introduced and by whom?"

a. "Might you have ever noticed anything remarkable about this man?"

2. "Might you have ever entered into a confidential agreement that may have involved Gabriel MacEnroe?"

a. If such existed, "Might it have been a private or official agreement?"

b. If such existed, "Might you outline in general terms the nature of such agreement?"

3. "Might you have ever spoken with a man named Robert Palm?" If so, "What might the circumstances have been as to how and when you might have become introduced and by whom?"

a. "Might you have ever noticed anything remarkable about this man?"

4. "Might you have ever spoken with a man named Robert Skirving?" If so, "What might the circumstances have been as to how and when you might have become introduced and by whom?"

a. "Might you have ever noticed anything remarkable about this man?"

Thanks,

-Zig-

-------- Original Message --------

From: bereal@safe-mail.net
To: eurotrustee@safe-mail.net
Subject: Re: Help please
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 11:14:45 -0400

Hey Zig,

Can you tell me who is asking the questions and can I have direct contact. Pardon my suspicious nature but I have experienced some questionable contacts and queries about my involvement with those people. Also I have red flags internally about both of them.

Thanks,

Mark "cautious" Kennedy

-------- Original Message --------

Ref: N1-4L-U_Eht
From: eurotrustee@safe-mail.net
To: injunearus@safe-mail.net
Cc:
Bcc: paco@safe-mail.net
Date: 25 May 2005 11:18
Subject: Re: Info for Van's Investigator......" TOGETHER WE STAND"

Your Team is consistent.

Chad Perry tried to throw things back in my lap.

Now, you try to throw things back in my lap.

It ain’t my lap this mess belongs in.

-Zig-

$25.00 ATM debit card you can load using e-Gold, e-Bullion, etc. Click here, or copy and paste into your browser: http://www.can-discount.com/index.php?ref=ICA2004006711

-------- Original Message --------

From: injunearus@safe-mail.net
To: eurotrustee@safe-mail.net
Cc: gator_ca@safe-mail.net
Bcc:
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 02:58:50 -0400
Subject: Info for Van's Investigator......" TOGETHER WE STAND"

Zig:

Here is the name of my Lawyer in Oregon:

Marc Sussman, P.C. - Attorney of Law
1906 S.W. Madison Street
Portland, Oregon 97205
TEL: (503) 221-0502
FAX: (503) 221-221-1908
E-mail: sussmarc@qwest.com

Marc Sussman has agreed he'd co-operate with Lawyers and Investigators that contact him from Van, et al.

He has all the testimony on all the questions asked which were documented by British Columbia Security people and by all the Oregon groups. He has all the copies of the real assets plus the Brazilian packages ( $1.5-billion + )

The questions you asked Chad (Gator) are also best answered in the British Columbia Security data that I authorized to be sent to the Oregon Investigators. I believe a copy is in the hands of Marc Sussman my Lawyer. This is much more accurate than me trying to remember the exact details.

I trust that this will answer all the questions you have.

in His Service ..... "Together we Stand"

Injunearus

-------- Original Message --------

Ref: N1-kxND6E4u
From: eurotrustee@safe-mail.net
To: injunearus@safe-mail.net
Cc:
Bcc: paco@safe-mail.net
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 03:20:54 -0400
Subject: Re: Info for Van's Investigator......" TOGETHER WE STAND"

Your subject title is extremely appropriate: "Together We Stand". The "together," in this case, is: You ( Richard ), Mark Kennedy, Chad Perry, plus a few others who seem to wear Teflon so far.

You have answered something I wondered about that was not printed in my email questions to you.

The unprinted question, “Will you, Mark, and Chad take the personal stance on your own as individuals to help non-government payroll defense, or will you hide?

I sincerely hope you guys ALL decide to come out of hiding, as individuals, not as a collective team spouting one party line.

I do take this situation of my brother being falsely imprisoned for 1-year (come 2-days more) VERY personal.

Each, of the 3, of you has been given the opportunity to stand-up and be counted on your own.

Mark Kennedy sent me a fishing expedition instead of simple answers.

Chad Perry sent me a response hiding behind you.

You send me a response hiding behind an attorney, Marc Sussman.

A few months ago, you sent me a response hiding behind Mark Kennedy.

Hmmm, maybe Zig is a slow learner.

The is the VERY last time you will hear this from me:

You can be a part of the solution, if you make the personal choice.

I am quite fed-up with games.

Zig

-------- Original Message --------

From: injunearus@safe-mail.net
To: eurotrustee@safe-mail.net
Cc:
Bcc: paco@safe-mail.net
Subject: Re: Info for Van's Investigator......" TOGETHER WE STAND"
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 03:56:47 -0400

Zig:

I am NOT playing games with you and forgive you for such a suggestion.

Van knows exactly what I faced and thought I was courageous to have voluntarily obeyed the subpoena and gone to Oregon.

I went on my own volition to show information that I believed would blow this right out of the water. THAT information is in the hands of my Lawyer.

I am as shocked as anyone as to the actions taken by U.S. authorities. I care about Van VERY much and am distraught at his detention every bit as much as you.

I had hoped that the info I shared having been put under investigation myself by several investigative forces would have nullified any further action on the part of the prosecution. My Lawyer has all the information I brought down there.

Therefore I believe it is in Van's best interest that his lawyers contact mine.

Mark, Chad, and I are definitely 3 independent people and I was very much alone when I went to Oregon. So again I don’t appreciate the insinuation of us hiding behind one another.

I pray that Van gets released ASAP so that he can begin preparing for his situation.

As for the remark of being coated with Teflon I am quite the opposite. I feel every word and unwritten words very personally. Trust me that Van has a friend forever in me.

I only wish I could do more, however my Lawyer has cautioned me to be very careful and therefore I believe the BEST thing to do is for your people to contact him.

in His Service .... I AM STANDING Zig!

Injunearus

-------- Original Message --------

From: bereal@safe-mail.net
To: eurotrustee@safe-mail.net
Cc: gator_ca@safe-mail.net , injunearus@safe-mail.net
Subject: Re: Help please
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 12:40:11 -0400

Hello Zig,

I really have no idea of what constitutes a Team and how one works on it. This makes your disclosure of no effective use for me. One mans Team is another's circle of friends, another mans acquaintances, and another's "never met him, but he seems nice, Joe likes him."

I thought we were all on the Team, and inclusion came from actions like mine in working to find a deal for the Restoration Project, Stay Alive Money ( S.A.M. ), and helping with the defense. If I am incorrect in my assumptions, feel free to correct me.

The fact that someone is on the Government payroll does not lead to the conclusion that I will automatically speak to them. You also state that Richard Downes and I willingly and openly spoke to the prosecution. This is an accusation, and "no," I did not miss it!

Perhaps you do not understand the difference between a subpoena and a voluntary appearance.

Perhaps, you have not yet been threatened by the FBI or prosecutors office so, you don't understand the difference between the two, or perhaps no one showed up at your door demanding an interview, called all your family, and friends to get the low down on you.

We are in the same boat. I know very little also, only what you post, which is very little.

If there is someone out there (an investigator) that knows all, now that makes me very nervous.

To think that 1 or 2 people (not Van) know the who's, what's, and where's, YIKES!!!

I thought the whole point of having independent teams operating toward the same goal was to protect the process from implosion if 1 soldier fell. You can enlighten me on this one, then I am sure I can rest at ease.

I am sorry to hear another person has fallen to the tactics of the prosecution. It saddens me to know that fear is the operating spirit active in the destruction of a good thing. I can relate very much to this because, from the day I left Grenada I have been living that way.

You see, I was stopped in Puerto Rico by the FBI and accused of stealing $63-billion dollars and from then on, my comfort, security, and peace was gone.

My main priority since then has been to protect my family and maintain normalcy.

It is now 5-years, almost to the day, and I am regaining some control in my destiny and letting go of fear. I will succeed, just like Restoration Project.

If you are seeking "games" then look no further. You have found the true players, the prosecution.

If you think that your investigator can do what 5 attornies and the Court of jurisdiction cannot do, then you must be working with God himself.

I myself like to work with God but so far have not been able to free our friends. I will endeavor to persevere so, lets be realistic, my experience is that He works on his own timetable and I must be patient.

There is no free will without consequence. Your use of the term is predisposed to imply guilt, and not in context. I have free will to speak or not to speak, but I must consider those who would be affected by my words. This is called responsibility and it sometimes overrides the exercising of free will.

I have not said I will not assist. I said I want to know whom I am speaking to before I decide to speak. That is not lack. That is willingness. It is you who now has free will to act. So, what are you waiting for?

Your conclusions are not correct, as I have articulated above, no "party line" yes "games" but not by us.

It seems that you, or the investigator, are the one's playing this game of hide and seek by not allowing your investigator to come forward as I have requested. This of course is enough to draw some conclusions about but I will refrain until I have the facts. You are not asking for pardon but giving justification for your accusations, and they are unfounded.

Again you have accused me of not supporting the cause, just like your quotable friend President Bush. Your choice of inspiring quotes is very clear communication that you now consider me an enemy of yours, the Restoration Project, and the incarcerated 5. You could not be more wrong!!! But you have the free will to come to any conclusion you can sleep with.

My concern is not with people knowing my address, but the context in which it was published.

The statement was, "Mark Kennedy is hiding in Canada from the FBI and prosecutors". The inference was, "To any who have an axe to grind, call him up, or call the FBI instead." Now that is dirty pool, bad karma, just plain nasty, and the same sort of tactic used by the Government to harass your dear friend whose computer was recently confiscated.

I am not in hiding; otherwise it would be impossible for the attorney's representing the defense to contact me so easily.

I have already been given a subpoena to testify at the Portland, Oregon federal trial so, I guess there would be little point in hiding, especially since the prosecution already knows I am a witness for the defense.

So, whoever dreamed up that little accusation, and I suspect it wasn't you, can just STOP with the bull. Thank you for that courtesy.

Regarding my sending copies of our e-mails to others. I will now extend this to you, as I would any person I do business with or friends, a policy I adopted after a life insurance sales person extracted a list of all my friends and family to sell insurance to and, whoa boy, I was in trouble when I did that.

Ever since, I always ask permission before I included Richard Downes and Chad Perry in my e-mail response to you. Zig, your insinuation of collaboration and collective decision-making is totally unfounded and very offensive. But wait. There is a collective. The collective consciousness of God, our Father whom Richard, Chad, and myself of go to make decisions. Oops, I stand corrected. We HAVE collectively made a decision. You caught me. I apologize for praying before responding to you. Hey, wait. I didn't pray, I just asked you to tell me whom the investigator was I would be responding to.

Once again you resign, but what do you resign from? From my perspective, you are resigning to a position of accusation, posturing, and fence building. This is not necessary, but it is your free will to do.

I suggest if your investigator wants candid dialogue he should first be candid. But instead, you have chosen to hide him. Very unfair of him, I think, putting you in a position that you will have to accuse those who have pledged to help those who have freely walked into the fire to see that the truth is told. How does that feel? Who would do such a thing to you?

Your closing is nice etiquette, but your emails have not been filled with blessings, instead, cursings. I sincerely hope you can climb down from that position because words are hard to get back.

I get the feeling you want to fight about this. Why? Do you have something personal against Richard Downes, Chad Perry, or me? Would you like to discuss it? If so, I would really appreciate any dialog that will uncover the truth and heal any wounds.

Mark Kennedy

-------- Original Message --------

From: eurotrustee@safe-mail.net
To: bereal@safe-mail.net
Subject: Re: Help please
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 15:07:36 -0400

Nice try, to turn this around to blame, your games onto me.

I sent 3 different people completely separate e-mails. I did not Cc: any of the 3 to notify them I had asked anything of anybody else but received back a party line.

I, Van's brother, asked for help and in return I received interrogation, "loose lips sink ships", "still small voice," "contact my attorney," and other lame excuses. You are free to deny that it was a party line. Certainly were amazing coincidences.

Your excuse of harassment by the government is indeed a sad event but does not impress me to the extent that you would like it to.

Van has been in jail for one year now. Our sister Irene ( Iris ) was jailed who had nothing to do with running the FIBG bank.

The FBI was successful in getting me jailed in the Dominican Republic that would make the worst jail facility in North America look like Four Seasons or better.

The Chairman of the Board Richard Downes and you and Lawrence Jones as CEO of the era has not been jailed and YOU are complaining of government verbal harassment? You know dang well, neither Iris nor I were ‘operating’ the bank.

You can get as self righteous with me as you care to. I sent a very simple request. You declined.

Of the questions YOU were asked, what is it that YOU have to hide? Why the fuss? Come on Mark, you say that you have been open with all so, how is it that Zig is so threatening? Such a high compliment, completely undeserved, I never dreamed of receiving.

You said, "I was stopped in Puerto Rico by the FBI and accused of stealing $63-billion dollars." Hmmm, how is it that such an amount of FIBG bank assets turned up missing prior to your departure from Grenada? And who, other than Lawrence Jones to the Grenada government alerted the FBI that those FIBG bank assets were missing? Wasn’t FBI jurisdiction in Puerto Rico to really care so, why would the FBI be intercepting you? You’re a Canadian citizen, aren’t you?

It wasn't Zig so, what is it you have to hide from me? So, you do not trust me. OK fine. What else is there for me to say?

I do wish you Many Blessings. Jesus loves all and instructed us to do the same.

Zig

-------- Original Message --------

From: eurotrustee@safe-mail.net
To: bereal@safe-mail.net
Subject: Re: Help please
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 06:09:22 -0400

Nice try. You are still on the 'interrogate Zig' page. We did not start there. We are not going to end there.

Sometimes trust leads to a two-way street. Sometimes trust is a one-way street as in faith in an unseen Jesus, faith that the check is in the mail, and faith that the piece of paper in your hand will buy a few groceries.

In 1999, while we were both in Grenada, before your resignation you gave me some personal reasons not to trust you. OK, bygones are bygones. Now you have successfully given me reasons to not trust you today. It is not up to me to prove anything to you, whether you like me or not is not material to the subject at hand.

You were the CEO at FIBG who participated in highly irregular activities for any business. Upon default of the bogus promises made to you and the Board, they put you psychologically on the run by intimidation, Zig didn't.

I have never once intimidated you while you were the CEO of FIBG and I treated you with respect. You did not give me a two-way street of trust then and, so far, not now.

Today, the 28th of May is the 1-year anniversary of Van's and Doug's kidnappings and senseless murder of a young family man in Luzira, Kampala, Uganda.

Even though Van socially associated with U.S. Embassy personnel, zero attempt was even made to hand him a piece of paper, but instead the grandstand show that ended so tragically.

I never once held anything close to a management position with the collapsed banks and companies. Interrogate me? About what, Mark?

You have no need to know, and I have no need to know the names, addresses, country locations, and contact information of those working 'outside' of the nice neat little government payroll box.

The government box has a 97% conviction rate, most of which are plea bargains to escape the centuries of years imprisoning defendants (guilty or not) are threatened and intimidated with.

The government box includes government paid defense attorneys and their government payroll investigators, underpaid, limited budget, and limited resources that are given limited time to defend against unlimited time, budgets, and resources.

The government's neat and tidy little box is designed on purpose to get convictions, regardless of guilt or innocence. The "system" is a sick sham attempting to give the appearance of "justice" to the voters who have never been exposed to it.

Speaking of intimidation, Doug Ferguson has not even requested a release hearing because the government box has threatened to jail Evelyn McClellan if he does. Is that playing at all fair? No, it is simply mental torture to try to get a plea.

Van's wife, Annet ( Rita ), was sent back to Uganda after being harassed at the U.S. arrival airport for over 12-hours by the feds. Everybody knows she is harmless. They already had every scrap of paper and every hard drive out of her and Van's house. They had already raided Comnet Services and Victoria Corporate Services in Kampala, Uganda that did some contract work for Van. Harassment of Rita was simply additional mental torture aimed at Van, and Doug, Eve, you, me, anybody else they want to intimidate by this example of screwing with family if you do not cooperate and sign a plea. So you have experienced verbal intimidation? My, my, my, how impressive.

There is a possibility that you could help, that Richard Downes could help. Even though more remote, there is a possibility that Chad Perry could help.

The help both you and Richard Downes have provided government payroll people, so far, has not helped those incarcerated and/or on bail release, and it has not made the intimidation used against you go away (per you). The definition of insanity is repeatedly doing the same things expecting different results. Why would a sane person, expecting different results, rest on providing the same information to people on the same payroll of the U.S. Government? You, Downes, and Perry have been presented the opportunity to step out of the government box that has gone nowhere positive for 5-years.

Regardless of whether my suspicion of collusion between you 3 has merit or not, the 3 of you have so far opted to not assist. If any, or all, of the 3 of you are so dissatisfied with the results you have experienced for 5-years why not try a change? Or are you 'satisfied' with the results?

I can think of some reasons to not change but that would elicit more of your accusations against me like what you have already thrown my way.

Aw shucks, here is one, you can have some free intelligence from me:

Gabriel McEnroe is on widely published public record as being a government agent sent to Grenada by the U.S. government, explicitly to FIBG. You and Richard Downes were wittingly or unwittingly, U.S. government agents when you bought into the line of b.s. McEnroe threw at FIBG. It is thus well established that both you and Richard Downes assisted in the tearing down of the FIBG system as agents of MacEnroe the U.S. government agent.

Before you resigned, Richard Downes bragged to me that he was to be given 6 South American banks to run because of his role in cooperation with Gabriel McEnroe, which was Downes personal enrichment motivation to perform his highly irregular FIBG Board activity.

The manner in which you failed to answer the questions I forwarded to you provided the answer that was expected.

What neither of you have so far established is what side you are actually on today, if not continuing to be on the government's side, as you wittingly or unwittingly were then. Before you get all huffy on me, I did type "wittingly or unwittingly".

The ball is in your collective and individual court to prove otherwise. I did not start the ball on a "collective" basis. I gave each of you the opportunity to stand on your own two feet.

Each of you are given the opportunity to stand on your own innocence as an individual, regardless of what those of you may or may not have been up-to in the past or present. Each of you is given the individual opportunity to try to be of assistance.

Harassment against you proves nothing. Extremely frequent, the left-hand of the government does not know the agenda of the right-hand.

The government operates on a "need to know" basis, in addition to being frequently inept, wrong intelligence for the right situation, friendly fire casualties, collateral damage, expendable soldiers and agents, etc., etc., etc..

Interrogating Zig proves nothing, except to further reinforce the existing suspicions.

Even though the situation is very personal to me, and to you, let's try to not get bogged down in personal issues.

Zig

-------- Original Message --------

From: bereal@safe-mail.net
To: eurotrustee@safe-mail.net
Subject: Re: Re: Help please
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:17:26 -0400

Hello Zig,

It appears (at least from my point of view) that you have a fixed belief about me, based on your experience. I suppose there may be a few offences included in that view. I offer to you to work those issues out and freely discuss whatever you want to work out.

I will repeat, your suspicions are unfounded. Your viewpoints are perhaps influenced with some quasi facts but, they are yours and you have a right to your opinion.

I certainly do not wish to add to your dis-ease regarding myself or anyone else, but I will hold on my original decision to not speak through you. I will speak directly to whomever you wish. I may be paranoid, but I suspect that your investigator will decline any direct contact with me, and he/she has already decided who and what my role was.

If you feel that I am not trustworthy of participating in the Restoration Project, you may withdraw my name from any e-mail list you have or other connection, and if you wish, pass my e-mail address through Katongole Sande Yude in Kampala, Uganda as Attorney-In-Fact for Ample Trust pursuant to the “SeaSignature agreement via Coded Address ss_rafaphes” under transaction code No. CHCH/01/000-101 dated February 5, 2004 to Charles L. Webb for me, at:

ADMINISTRADORA PANAMENA de BIENES INTERNACIONAL, S.A.
Avenida Balboa
Galleria Balboa
2 PISO, OFICINA 39, 40 and 41
Ciudad de Panama
REPUBLICA de PANAMA

I will gladly communicate with him by signing-off on the Deed Of Assignment for and return the EQUITY RETIREMENT DISTRIBUTORS (CANADA) LIMITED stock shares I was assigned, as follows:

1,418,182 common shares of EQUITY RETIREMENT DISTRIBUTORS (CANADA) LIMITED, a publicly owned company incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada, whose stock symbol on the Pink Sheets exchange is ERDLF (hereinafter "ERDL"), bearing a restrictive covenant stipulating that no public sale of them may be conducted prior to January 27th, 2008 unless the sale price is $5.00 (USD) or more; and,

416,000 preferred shares of the said EQUITY RETIREMENT DISTRIBUTORS (CANADA) LIMITED, bear a restrictive covenant stipulating that no public sale of them may be conducted prior to January 27th, 2008 unless the sale price is ten $(10.00 USD) United States Dollars or more.

I apologize for any offence I have caused directly or indirectly in your life and wish you well. I will bear no offence or ill feelings and I understand your concerns. I do not wish to cause hardship or stress in your life in any way and therefor believe I must back off and wait until you feel you can benefit from any relationship with me.

Thank you for the meetings on the path of life and the good advice you have shared, which became valuable to me.

Best Regards,

Mark Kennedy

-------- Original Message --------

From: bereal@safe-mail.net
To: eurotrustee@safe-mail.net
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Help please
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 13:37:35 -0400

Hey Zig,

Thanks for offering to be the messenger, but no thanks. With the unraveling of Equity Retirement Distributors Ltd. stock shares and my Christchurch Trust that you set up for me in ERDL, I would prefer if you would just pass my address on to Charles L. Webb (Panama) who you made Trustee over my Christchurch Trust. He would have to perform the duties of returning my ERDL stock shares to ERDL anyway.

I too would like to see your Brother released and exonerated. And, yes, it will have a positive effect on my life. I am always willing to "freely discuss" that.

Van and I worked out our differences a few years ago, which got me my ERDL stock shares.

I don't think there were any differences for you to work out with Richard Downes as he never left the process of receiving S.A.M. because he kept working alongside Van. Your brother and I had several common dreams and we agreed to work together on those items.

As for sending subordinate members of ERDL to you, I am sorry I don't recall what you are referring to but thank you just the same.

I am well aware that you made my life easier with money setting up IBCs and bank wire transfers for during my time in Grenada, and I thank you for it. Yes, I have been trained well, and that is part of my value at ERDL, plus I have a cautious nature.

As a parting comment, I would like to let you know what I really think is going on.

You have been contacted by Paul, who Van explained was on our side and wants to use his resources to help. Van showed me some big expose about what is really going on behind the scenes of FIBG and the incarceration of some of its principals, which will go a long way to freeing them. He also thinks that the true culprits will be exposed and that also will help those charged falsely. You perhaps agree with him and hence your personal emotional commitment to getting answers from Richard Downes, Chad Perry, and myself.

I have e-mailed Paul before and it did not produce what either of us expected and that is why I suspect he is not coming directly to Richard, Chad, or me. Based on the gravity of the situation and importance of what might be said, I am insisting on a policy of direct contact. This will ensure no misunderstanding and proper record keeping on my part. Any appearance of "he said, she said" third-party information is avoided and accuracy is improved.

Based on your communications, so far, I can see that you already have some information incorrect, but that is not for me to correct. I sincerely want to avoid certain information being repeated.

You will probably continue to refer to my comments as "the party line" but if you insist on brokering this process I will have to decline.

I also acknowledge your right to your views and opinions but ask that you refrain from making it personal. If we cannot work together then let us part as brothers in God and leave it at that.

I understand your frustration and strong desire to solve the critical issues at hand. I also extend my sympathy and compassion to you regarding the hardship you have had in the past due to the downfall of FIBG.

If I have offended you or caused you hurt in any way, please accept my apology, and I ask for your forgiveness.

Best Regards,

Mark Kennedy

-------- Original Message --------

====


PREFACE NOTES

Securing International Witness Testimony

MLAT: USA & UK

. . . [EDITED-OUT FOR BREVITY] . . .

Article 10 provides that where a requesting party seeks assistance in facilitating the appearance of a witness in its territory, the role of the Central Authority is simply to ask the "person whose voluntary appearance in the territory of the Requesting Party is desired whether he/she agrees to appear."

On February 1, 2001 the U.S. Department of Justice sent to the United Kingdom Central Authority a request for assistance under their Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) in Criminal Matters signed January 6, 1994 and in force since December 2, 1996. The assistance requested was "in facilitating the appearance of Farih Tabbah ... in Washington, D.C. ... for the purpose of testifying before the Grand Jury."

. . . [EDITED_OUT FOR BREVITY] . . .

By that, he made clear he meant orally and in-person and pointed out "it is generally accepted that it is a great advantage to any tribunal to see witnesses-of-fact for itself."

He added this was "still true, although no doubt to a lesser extent" when the witnesses were not subject to cross-examination, and that "the risk that the witness might give false evidence, whether deliberately or not, is usually a matter best left to the tribunal itself".

For my part, it seems that the judge at this point did not address all relevant considerations.

First, although the established or ordinary procedure for taking the evidence of witnesses present in the United States is oral and in secret, the taking of evidence in this way from overseas witnesses depends on their willingness to attend in the United States. Otherwise, it is only possible under any treaty that may exist with the overseas country and in accordance with the domestic rules of that country.

. . . [EDITED_OUT FOR BREVITY] . . .

Reference

http://www.austlii.edu.au/~andrew/bailii/Joe/Data/EW_EWCA_Civ_2002_950.rtf

====

CIRCA: 2006

[NOTE: 2006 U.S. federal criminal court proceedings attempt to secure foreign testimony of London, UK barristers Lawrence Jones and Jonathan Kremner (aka) Johnathan Kremner by federal criminal defendants Douglas Christie-Ferguson sees this reasonable facsimile portion of the original federal court docket sheet (below)]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND, OREGON

United States Of America,
PLAINTIFF

v.

Gilbert Allen Ziegler (aka) Van Arthur Brink, Douglas Christie-Ferguson, Robert John Skirving, Laurent E. Barnabe, Rita L. Regale (aka) Rita L. Brunges,
DEFENDANTS

CASE NO.: CR-01 00321-GMK

Original case filed: 2001

U.S. Magistrate: Hon. Dennis Hubel

Superceding Indictment filed: October 27, 2003

U.S. District Court Judge: Hon. Garr M. King

Docket sheet (below)

PACER pull date: 05/23/2006

. . . [EDITED-OUT FOR BREVITY] . . .

- - - -

19MAY06 Docket line item # 468: "Motion To Compel Government To Utilize M.L.A.T. To Secure Deposition Testimony Of John Taylor (Hearing Requested)" by Rita L. Regale, Douglas Ferguson, Robert Skirving, and Laurent Barnabe. (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

19MAY06 Docket line item # 469: "Motion For Issuance Of Letter Rogatory To Scotland For The Deposition Of John Taylor (Hearing Requested)" by Douglas C. Ferguson, Rita Regale, Robert Skirving, and Laurent Barnabe. (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

9MAY06 Docket line item # 470: "PROPOSED Letter Rogatory John Taylor." (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

19MAY06 Docket line item # 471: "Motion For Order Authorizing The Deposition Of Jonathan Kremner Pursuant To Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (FRCrP) 15 (Hearing Requested)" by Laurent E. Barnabe. (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

19MAY06 Docket line item # 472: "Affidavit Of Douglas Stringer In Support Of Motion For Rule 15 Deposition Of Jonathan Kremner." (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

19MAY06 Docket line item # 473: "Motion To Compel Government To Utilize M.L.A.T. To Secure Deposition Testimony Of Johnathan Kremner (#471) (Hearing Requested)" by Rita L. Regale, Douglas Ferguson, Robert Skirving, and Laurent Barnabe. (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

19MAY06 Docket line item # 474: "Motion For Issuance Of Letter Rogatory To The United Kingdom For The Deposition Of Johnathan Kremner (Hearing Requested)" by Douglas C. Ferguson, Rita Regale, Robert Skirving, and Laurent Barnabe. (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

19MAY06 Docket line item # 475: "PROPOSED Letter Rogatory To The United Kingdom For The Deposition Of Johnathan Kremner" by Douglas C. Ferguson, Rita Regale, Robert Skirving, and Laurent Barnabe. (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

19MAY06 Docket line item # 476: "Motion For Order Authorizing The Deposition Of Lawrence Jones Pursuant To FRCrP 15 (Hearing Requested)" by Laurent E. Barnabe. (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

19MAY06 Docket line item # 477: "Affidavit Of Lynne B. Morgan In Support Of Motion For Rule 15 Deposition Of Lawrence Jones." (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

19MAY06 Docket line item # 478: "Motion To Compel Government To Utilize M.L.A.T. To Secure Deposition Testimony Of Lawrence Jones (Hearing Requested)" by Rita L. Regale, Douglas Ferguson, Robert Skirving, and Laurent Barnabe. (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

19MAY06 Docket line item # 479: "Motion For Issuance Of Letter Rogatory To The United Kingdom For The Deposition Of Lawrence Jones (Hearing Requested)" by Douglas C. Ferguson, Rita Regale, Robert Skirving, and Laurent Barnabe. (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

19MAY06 Docket line item # 480: "Letter Rogatory To The United Kingdom For The Deposition Of Lawrence Jones" (#479) filed by Douglas C. Ferguson. (Entered: 05/22/2006)

- - - -

. . . [EDITED-OUT FOR BREVITY] . . .

05/23/2006

- - - -

CONCLUSION

On or before November 2005, Charles L. Webb was instructed by Mark Kennedy to return his nearly 1,500,000 shares of stock in EQUITY RETIREMENT DISTRIBUTORS LTD. ( ERDL ) to Joseph R. Cavness, CPA in Carmichael, California on behalf of ERDL former President Allan Sanford who in December 2005 changed the name of EQUITY RETIREMENT DISTRIBUTORS LTD. ( ERDL ) to INFINITY MINING CORP.

On November 25, 2005 Van Brink released information regarding Mark Kennedy who became engaged in a sideline gold enhancement business arrangement with Cynthia Joy (“Tai”) Hastey and Tucker Leon Harrington.

On December 10, 2005 Van Arthur Brink died before his case went to trial, but passed along information for his defense surrounding Lawrence Jones, Esq. and Jonathan Kremner, Esq. of the United Kingdom, John Taylor of Falkirk, Scotland and others. On May 19, 2005 all three (3) became named in Portland, Oregon federal court record proceedings as foreign witnesses sought by defense attornies on behalf of Douglas Christie-Ferguson, Laurent E. Barnabe, Robert John Skirving, and Rita L. Regale.

Within 30-days, in June 2006, the Portland federal court saw the U.S. government accept guilty plea agreements signed by Robert John Skirving and Rita L. Regale whom are expected to serve no more than 4-years in federal prison although sentences may reflect a greater amount of time.

On October 27, 2006 James Gregory “Zig” Ziegler arrived in Manila, The Philippines aboard a QATAR Airline and located himself in a village within the municipality township of Cabadbaran, Agusan Del Norte on the island of Mindanao residing in a small resort hotel while operating a gold mine operation he’s had built for himself and a few of his friends. Ziegler gained control of over $47,000,000 (as of October 2003) that had been placed in FOREX accounts by his brother Van A. Brink since 2000 while Zig Ziegler continues using his foreign Trusts, Foundations and international business companies’ ( IBCs’ ) attornies in the El Batey, Sousa, Dominican Republic and Charlestown, Nevis who established foreign bank accounts used to distribute dividends from out of numerous multiple FOREX accounts this very today. Many believe those monies came from fraudulent offshore bank enterprises, namely FIBG and others within their network system being run by Brink, his brother Zig Ziegler, and others within the DOMINION OF MELCHIZEDEK. Zig Ziegler, while carrying on his own internet fraud scheme went on to take over the internet fraud scheme named “Restoration Project” and “Instauration Project” that defrauded about 400 people out of $6-million (USD) additional between 2002 and 2006. In July 2006, Zig Ziegler began running yet another internet fraud scheme asking those within the range of his broadcast e-mails to invest between $5,000 to $10,000 or more for his gold mine in The Philippines. And, although U.S. federal authorities were unable to successfully obtain a federal criminal indictment against Zig Ziegler in September 2004, he remains a free man today.

In February 2007, Douglas Christie-Ferguson and Laurent E. Barnabe are expected to begin their federal criminal court trial by jury.

A brief package of ‘official document copies’ - less than 3-Megabytes in file-size - in support of this report are available.


Submitted by,

Offshore Informant
E-MAIL: OffshoreInformant@safe-mail.net

/

/


Anonymous
Posted: Saturday, August 13, 2011

Posted: 2/5/2009 5:55:11 AM

By: Cabadbran

If you are within Agusan del Norte, come and visit
a new unique resort by the river, with cool spring

The GAZEBO - pool and restaurant
A riverside spring resort

http://www.cebuspring.com/gazebo.htm

click on website above

or search " the Gazebo Cabadbaran"

great for parties, weddings, business seminars, etc...
affordable food and room accommodations...

you can bring your own food, w/ no corkage fee...

just 35 mins ride from Butuan City


a nice place you would not want to miss....


The Gazebo
Quarry, Brgy 9
Cabadbaran City
Agusan del Norte
Tel: 63918-9183394

------------------------------
Cold spring resort in Cabadbaran
Agusan del Norte


Anonymous
Posted: Saturday, August 13, 2011

Posted: 3/10/2007 10:34:35 PM

By: Phyllis Miller

Oh where, Oh where can the nasty man be? James Gregory “Zig” Ziegler.


Anonymous
Posted: Saturday, August 13, 2011

Posted: 11/29/2006 2:05:53 PM

By: Understanding Ongoing Frauds

One message poster asks 'why' posts surrounding names of individuals and enterprises involved in international financial business investment fraud that are familiar to some people continue being provided as background details for update alerts to ongoing international criminal enterprises with many of the same names that continue to defraud hundreds of people who are unaware of them and their backgrounds.

When law enforcement, for whatever reason, has not yet shutdown ongoing international criminal enterprise networks continuing to successfully harvest hundreds of investors into becoming victims of fraud, then alerts providing details provide 'less revenue from fraud going to crooks'.

Those, other than fraudsters, would quickly know 'why' background information and updates importantly identify 'ongoing patterns of financial investment frauds' with the same players using new representatives and new frauds that grows exisiting fraud networks into new arenas expanding the scope of frauds that capture more and more new investor victims 'daily', while 'news and information alerts' serve to slow and limit financial losses to victims around the world.

Limiting the flow of news, alerts, and updates surrounding such frauds will only serve to increase revenue to fraudsters.

So, when a poster claims to identify their familiarity with names and enterprises identied in a message post of legacy frauds where some but not all crimes were solved within that fraud now linked to ongoing financial investment crimes, one may have difficulty locating wisdom in 'why' anyone would ever wish to limit or curtail background information for update alerts to crimes still ongoing.

While my particular message posts primarily consist of research notes, memos, letters, communications, and documentary evidence they are provided so that in-review anyone may be able to draw their own conclusions once alerted to the fact old fraudsters are alive and well taking millions from new victims.

There appears to be no wisdom in keeping potential investors in the dark, blinded from patterns of old fraudsters whom continue to operate to this very day but with new shoes for new convincingly new twists to financial crimes.

Everyone works harder today for their monies, more-so than ever before, and financial fraudsters work even harder when more people know more about them and their fraudulent practices.

I could be wrong but these are just my opinions based on my work in the information business for over 34-years.

Submitted,

Offshore Informant
[E-MAIL: OffshoreInformant@safe-mail.net]

/

/


 

Jump to different Forum... 

We hunt for red flags in high-value, cross-border finance by monitoring offshore and onshore courts, regulatory actions, offering documents, and other sources - and email you the results.

View Recent Digests

Cayman Court Secrecy: A Huge Red Flag for Foreign Investors & Clients
David Marchant
As any fule kno, the biggest enemy of fraud, corruption, money laundering, and other forms of financial crime is transparency, while their best friend is secrecy. That's why the unprecedented mass sealing of cases that's taking place at the Financial Services Division of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands is repugnant to anyone with a genuine concern for financial crime.