Michael Pickholz v. TransparentBusiness, Inc. et al: Amended Complaint (‘Whistleblower Retaliation’)

Amended Complaint alleging the plaintiff’s employment was terminated “in blatant retaliation for raising concerns about what he reasonably believed to be financial or accounting fraud and violations of federal securities laws, rules and/or regulations” in Michael Pickholz v. TransparentBusiness, Inc., described as the operator of “a digital platform that helps companies manage remote workers”, and Alexandre Konanykhin at the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

- You’re only seeing part of this content
  
  To view the entire article or download the document, subscribe today.
  
  – Offshore Courts: 29,000+ court cases (Bahamas, Bermuda, BVI, Cayman Islands)
  – Investigative Articles: 4,500+ in-depth articles, including fraud exposés
  – MLATs – Criminal: 1,400+ MLATs on global criminal investigations
  – Ch. 15 – Insolvencies: Monitored daily
  – Foreign Discovery: Applications for foreign discovery filed in the USA, monitored daily
  – Regulatory Actions: Global regulatory actions, fines, and bans, monitored daily
  – And More: Criminal indictments, extraditions, winding-up petitions, and more
  
  Unlimited access for less than $3/day.
  
  Cancel anytime.
  
  SUBSCRIBE
- SIGN IN
  
  Forgot your password?

Pages: 182

Date: March 05, 2024

Defendants/Respondents: TransparentBusiness, Inc., Alexandre Konanykhin

Plaintiffs/Applicants: Michael Pickholz

Case Number: Xx Xx Xx

Topic: Whistleblowing

Allegation: Fraud

Plaintiffs/Applicants Attorneys: Edward Cerasia II, Cerasia Law

Topics

Fraud USA Whistleblowing

Keywords

Alexandre Konanykhin Jonathan Quint Jorge Titinger Maria Moschini Michael Pickholz

Paul Roberts Peter Smirnov TransparentBusiness

[ 3 more... ] [ top 5 ]

BECOME A SUBSCRIBER

Daily red flags in high-value international finance

Unlimited access. No contracts. Cancel anytime.